Sydney Airport Message Board

Sydney Airport Message Board (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/index.php)
-   Spotting and Movements (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Virgin (XR) ATR operating Moranbah (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/showthread.php?t=8362)

Rowan McKeever 2nd July 2012 12:56 PM

Virgin (XR) ATR operating Moranbah
 
G'day all

Just noticed on flightaware FVX operated a short series of flights between MOV and BNE late last week (2 southbound and 1 northbound). Would this have been part of a charter operation that Skywest would normally handle itself or a separate charter for Virgin? Is it something we're likely to see more of in the future.

Thanks a lot!
Rowan

JamesL 2nd July 2012 04:02 PM

I am lead to believe it was a route proving flight...

Radi K 2nd July 2012 08:27 PM

They are charters while they had a spare ATR. They start rotating through TSV/CNS/ROK from this week so all capacity occupied again for a while.

Rowan McKeever 3rd July 2012 12:19 PM

Cheers guys... I liked the idea it might have been route proving but would've preferred to see them take E190s in. Ain't gonna beat a Q400 with ATR72!

JamesL 3rd July 2012 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rowan McKeever (Post 75674)
Cheers guys... I liked the idea it might have been route proving but would've preferred to see them take E190s in. Ain't gonna beat a Q400 with ATR72!


Wanna bet? :p

Rowan McKeever 3rd July 2012 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesL (Post 75678)
Wanna bet? :p

Honestly I've not been on an ATR72-500 ever, let alone Virgin's. Just can't imagine I'd want to do it on a flight to MOV when the Q400 is so much faster! Is it any cheaper to run over that distance?

Paul S. 3rd July 2012 02:40 PM

Im with James, proving flight

JamesL 3rd July 2012 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rowan McKeever (Post 75679)
Honestly I've not been on an ATR72-500 ever, let alone Virgin's. Just can't imagine I'd want to do it on a flight to MOV when the Q400 is so much faster! Is it any cheaper to run over that distance?

Depending on the flight time the ATR wins and the time is just over an hour, I am led to believe.

Rowan McKeever 3rd July 2012 03:44 PM

According to QF schedules it's 1:50 for Q400 and 2:10 for Q300 - ATR would be similar to Q300. I'd believe the ATR is cheaper to run on face value but is it cheaper by enough to make up for the 20 min time difference?

Steve Jones 4th July 2012 07:50 AM

When DJ/XR were making a decision on which turboprop to purchase, you can be sure they weighed up speed vs fuel burn (and no doubt a bunch of other things as well). The ATR obviously won out...

I don't know the exact numbers (a pilot or someone else on this board may be able to shed some light), but I've heard the ATR's fuel burn numbers are quite impressive when compared to the Q400, let alone, of course, the E170... In an environment of high fuel prices and uncertainty as to where that price will go, it seems to me to be a smart move.


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022