Sydney Airport Message Board

Sydney Airport Message Board (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/index.php)
-   Admin and Feedback (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Using the "Quote" function correctly (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/showthread.php?t=169)

Craig Murray 30th March 2008 01:42 PM

Using the "Quote" function correctly
 
This is something that's bugged me since the function was incorporated into the previous board and it is again rearing its head here.

Can we see some restraint from users and positive moderation from the site admin in relation to quotes?

Please do not quote an entire message but rather quote only the relevant text. All you have to do is delete the non essential information between the "Quote" tags in your reply.

Your views on this would be welcomed.

Craig Murray 30th March 2008 01:43 PM

For example, rather than do this

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig Murray (Post 995)
This is something that's bugged me since the function was incorporated into the previous board and it is again rearing its head here.

Can we see some restraint from users and positive moderation from the site admin in relation to quotes?

Please do not quote an entire message but rather quote only the relevant text. All you have to do is delete the non essential information between the "Quote" tags in your reply.

Your views on this would be welcomed.

Do this

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig Murray (Post 995)
Please do not quote an entire message but rather quote only the relevant text.

You'll note that next to the user name in the above quote you are given the option of seeing the post being quoted which renders the need to re-quote the entire post completely useless.

Lukas M 30th March 2008 01:50 PM

Thanks for the advice;);)

Rod Sloan 30th March 2008 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig Murray (Post 995)

Your views on this would be welcomed.

Great idea.

Mark D 31st March 2008 08:52 AM

It's not a problem limited to discussion boards either, the number of emails I get from varying sources that quote the whole of a previous message to reference one line is a pain.
Back when I started on dial-up (2400 baud even) & BBSes that was very bad etiquette due to the time they took to download! now everyone is on broad(er) band that's not considered a problem I suppose....
So I'm a dinosaur :-)

Nigel C 6th April 2009 08:19 PM

Another thing that's been selectively 'moderated' recently (presumably due to the sheer weight of time involved to do every 'offending' post) is quoting the message that appears immediately above the reply post.

Nigel C 6th April 2009 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nigel C (Post 25903)
Another thing that's been selectively 'moderated' recently (presumably due to the sheer weight of time involved to do every 'offending' post) is quoting the message that appears immediately above the reply post.

So here's the reply to the post that appears above.
Personally I don't see the point in quoting the post immediately above, and not even part of it; if you read down the page the reply should make sense like you're reading a (hopefully) sensible book, or a fine magazine like Australian Aviation.

Perhaps we can all make the effort to not just quote every post that appears immediately above where we're replying. This might also help remove the appearance of 'selective' moderating.

Craig Murray 6th April 2009 08:57 PM

Couldn't agree more Nigel. Put simply, it isn't necessary.

There are some that think this method of posting is modus operandi however by following the correct procedure to alert the moderation team to these posts we can hopefully gain a neater, more efficient and legendary forum.

The correct procedure for reporting "Quote abuse" is the "Report Post" icon, click on it and offer forth a clear and valid explanation as to why the post should be edited/removed. This is the preferred method to the time honoured tradition of marinating the user in flammable material, firing up all four burners on the Webbebberkew and dishing out a whopping great grillin' :D

I'm sure, and don't quote me (couldn't resist the pun!), the moderators will agree.

Philip Argy 6th April 2009 09:39 PM

Superfluous quotations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nigel C (Post 25905)
So here's the reply to the post that appears above.
.... if you read down the page the reply should make sense ....

The Board offers the option of displaying threads with newest first, which is what I do, so that the latest contribution is at the top rather than the bottom, and the thread reads from bottom to top. So I only have to scroll down a few contributions to pick up the sense of any thread I've not previously followed. It probably saves me a few minutes per visit = 5 mins per day = 35 mins a week .... But I agree with the criticism of superfluous quoting.

Kurt A 7th April 2009 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nigel C (Post 25903)
presumably due to the sheer weight of time involved to do every 'offending' post

Hi Nigel, you are quite right in fact, when on occasions there could be anywhere between 30 and 60 new posts to read each day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nigel C (Post 25905)
This might also help remove the appearance of 'selective' moderating.

Nig, great again, as it's certainly a valid observation. And thank you for pointing it out. As whilst we'd like to be able to 'fix' every post so it appears without the aforementioned "quote"; purely by coincidence, a Moderator may have missed some posts during their read. Everyone's understanding here is greatly appreciated as it's certainly not selective moderating we're applying, or any anti-favouritism at all.

In any case, the below solution should help alleviate any concerns.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig Murray (Post 25907)
The correct procedure for reporting "Quote abuse" is the "Report Post" icon, click on it and offer forth a clear and valid explanation as to why the post should be edited/removed. This is the preferred method to the time honoured tradition of marinating the user in flammable material, firing up all four burners on the Webbebberkew and dishing out a whopping great grillin' :D

I'm sure, and don't quote me (couldn't resist the pun!), the moderators will agree.

Thanks Craig. That's twice for you in one week :)

Andrew P 7th April 2009 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philip Argy (Post 25911)
The Board offers the option of displaying threads with newest first, which is what I do,

an excellent feature, which I have used since the new board was upgraded

wish other boards had this facility too

Banjo

Andrew P 8th April 2009 09:35 AM

only trade off reading top down, easier if the « Previous Thread | Next Thread » function was at the top of thread

Justin L 8th April 2009 09:43 AM

I find clicking on the "View First Unread" button at the top left of the thread when you open it comes in very handy. It skips down to the first new post of the thread and you can scroll down from there to subsequent new threads.

Gerard M 6th June 2009 04:48 PM

Don't know if this is an option that can be made available or not but what would help the quote system is if you could highlight the section of a reply that your responding to in the original message and then hit the quote function and only have the highlighted bit come up. I know when i do it i just delete what i dont need but especially in the big posts it would make it a lot easier and less work for the mods to keep removing unnecessay quotes.
Is this sort of option avaliable with the board software?

No, its not an option...your method is the preferred one -mod

Matt_L 27th July 2009 06:25 PM

I keep being brought up on it but it is pretty ridiculous when im quoting one line to be told not to quote whole post.

Some common sense is necessary here- i understand we dont want threads with 6-8 line quotes as it clogs etc but with 1-2 line quotes its just stupid to correct someone on it.

Would love some justification,

Cheers

Moderator 27th July 2009 10:16 PM

Quite simply Matt, you will get pulled up for quoting the entire post directly above your reply regardless if it's one line or 10 lines, its not necessary and generally makes the threads harder to read.

If you want to single out a particular part of the post directly above yours, you can edit the quote and thats fine. For example;
Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt_L
Some common sense is necessary here

This is what all the moderators have agreed on as a standard approach to quoting protocol. We often don't have time to read each and every post, however when we see it being done, or if its reported to us, it will be fixed.

Philip Argy 28th July 2009 01:35 AM

If you're responding to the immediately preceding post, as I am here, there is usually no need to quote anything. I only use the Quote function if I'm commenting on something from a non-contiguous post that needs to be included for context. It's pretty easy to edit out the portions of text that you don't need to quote. Sometimes, Matt_L, you only have to use the name of the poster that you're responding to if the intervening posts are short and the post being replied to remains in view for most people.

Matt_L 28th July 2009 09:54 AM

Fair enough guys,

thanks for explanation- makes total sense.

Cheers

Kurt A 9th November 2009 08:41 AM

Hi all,

Over the past few weeks, "quoting the entire previous post" behaviour has crept back into 'play'.

Please be reminded not to reply using the quote function for direct replies to posts in sequence, and also refrain from quoting the entire previous post.

Thank you.

Moderator 9th December 2009 09:18 AM

This seems to be a continuing problem, please remember not to quote the entire above post. Repeat offenders will have posts deleted.

Moderator 3rd March 2010 04:21 PM

The situation regarding not quoting the entire above post has improved since the topic was last brought back to the forefront last December. Thank you everyone for your cooperation.

However in the past few weeks it has begun to resurface, quite often from users who post regularly on the board.

The Moderators have been simply removing these quotes as they have appeared, however we would appreciate everyone's cooperation to continue to allow this board to be easy to read.


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022