Sydney Airport Message Board

Sydney Airport Message Board (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/index.php)
-   Spotting and Movements (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Aircraft Crash Essendon YMEN (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/showthread.php?t=11399)

Nigel C 22nd February 2017 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkR (Post 102583)
Way too early for speculation, but there would appear to be some parallels with Advance Airlines Flight 4210 incident at YSSY, including the fact I suspect its the port engine that possibly failed, single pilot ops and aircraft was turning into the dead engine.

Yesterday's accident was 37 years to the day since the Advance Airlines tragedy :(

Robert Zweck 28th February 2017 04:23 PM

Last year we visited the DFO and parked next to the northern car park fence. A King Air landed on RWY 27 and rolled through at high speed. We were alarmed at how close he was to the fence.

What if a loss of directional control?

MarkR 29th March 2017 09:39 AM

Interim report has been published, CVR wasn't operative unfortunately.

http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...r/ao-2017-024/

Quote:

That examination found that the cores of both engines were rotating and that there was no evidence of pre-impact failure of either engine’s internal components.

Adrian B 29th March 2017 01:29 PM

There is also word of allegedly contaminated fuel delivery out of a new truck.

MarkR 29th March 2017 02:51 PM

You mean a rumour, as opposed to what's been reported?

Quote:

review of the approval process for the building that was struck by the aircraft
Should be interesting.

Philip Argy 29th March 2017 03:36 PM

Fuel?
 
One would hope that the fuel truck and its contents were isolated and tested immediately after the event. But if that happened, why no mention of it in the interim report?

Also, the abnormally long take-off roll could indicate that the engines were not developing full power.

Certainly a line of enquiry that needs some focus ...

Martin Buzzell 30th March 2017 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philip Argy (Post 102987)
Also, the abnormally long take-off roll could indicate that the engines were not developing full power.

I thought about this. Not knowing the 200, wouldn't that show on the gauges?


I wonder what the take off weight was? They were on a golf trip.

Philip Argy 30th March 2017 09:23 AM

Loading?
 
I believe the B200 is nominally a 12 seater plus luggage, so it would be surprising if pilot plus four golfers, even with lots of gear, would exceed MTOW. But that will obviously be a line of enquiry for ATSB.

The facts reported to date just leave a big puzzle which will require a lot of effort to solve, especially now that the CVR has been found to have stopped recording anything after a flight on 3 January 2017.

MarkR 30th March 2017 10:04 AM

Flap settings were wrong, which may explain the longer takeoff roll.

Adrian B 30th March 2017 02:00 PM

Also heard of a 5 knot tailwind to match


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022