View Single Post
  #11  
Old 5th February 2010, 10:28 AM
Will H Will H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 199
Default

David Learmount at Flightglobal (where I work, although I haven't David) has posted what I find to be a very rational and clear comment about the trial.

Quote:
This court case is pointless. Concorde itself will never fly again, and in the unlikely event that any new technical facts emerge that had not already been examined by the accident investigators, they are unlikely to provide lessons that are transferable to in-service types because so much about Concorde's design is unique. If the argument is that the prosecution is being pursued "pour encourager les autres", or to see justice served by jailing some individuals on the grounds they are guilty of manslaughter through criminal negligence, which group of people will welcome this judicial revenge against five individuals? There has been no baying for blood over this accident, merely sadness.
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/le...criminals.html
Reply With Quote