Quote:
Originally Posted by Montague S
|
Thanks Montague S
Note the third main paragraph on page 2 of the Report, as well as the third paragraph in the boxed section on that page:
Quote:
Readers are advised that the NTSC investigates for the sole purpose of
enhancing aviation safety. Consequently, NTSC reports are confined
to matters of safety significance and may be misleading if used for any other purpose.
|
and
Quote:
Readers should note that the information in NTSC reports and
recommendations is provided to promote aviation safety. In no case is it intended to imply blame or liability.
|
That would be sufficent for any jury or panel of judges to have reasonable doubts if the report as such was tendered in evidence as proof of any criminal conduct. That's why the underlying evidence itself has to be presented to the triers of fact and the theory of what happened and how it proves the criminality of the pilot all developed from first principles. Whilst the Schapelle Corby case doesn't give me the greatest faith in the Indonesian criminal justice system, it's better than you get in many other countries and it's at least open for all to see.