I like how the SMH article now has this line:
Quote:
|
A Qantas spokeswoman said there was "no suggestion it's come from our aircraft".
|
You can only hope that this autobot reponse was before the Batam debris imagery started coming out.
Meanwhile their approach to Twitter is poor - twitter is where the misconceptions about the incident got completely out of hand, but their official twitter team (as linked from
http://www.qantas.com.au/travel/airl...w-us/global/en ) could only say this:
http://twitter.com/qftravelinsider/status/29637434349
Quote:
|
@senopatix @bradatslice @grahamhills hi, we are an editorial team managing http://su.pr/3Egebp please direct your enquiries to Qantas direct
|
Basically their engagement with Twitter at present is purely marketing... not a great look when expectations today are that official Twitter accounts should be about customer engagement, not just promotion.