View Single Post
  #13  
Old 27th March 2008, 03:31 PM
Torin Wilson Torin Wilson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shameel Kumar View Post
Firstly, wasn't the latest KC-767 tanker based on the 767-200LRF platform, not the -200ER?
The tankers which Italy and Japan have placed orders for are straight-up conversions of 767-200ER aircraft.

The E-10 which Scott took a couple of photos of is based off the 767-400ER platform and it seems as though it is/was a replacement for the Boeing 707-based E-3 Sentry AWACS, the E-8 Joint STARS aircraft, and EC-135 ELINT aircraft.

So from that the question I have for Scott is... why do you suggest that the E-10 will soon be collecting dust out in the desert? Did the development ..and ultimately the production of the E-10 depend on the new KC-767 Advanced Tanker winning the USAF aerial refueling bid? .... couldn't it still be built regardless of the KC-767's fate?
You're right about the 200ER/LRF thing. But if you read the link I posted it explains exactly what you are asking.

The E10A funding was dropped at the end of FY07.
Reply With Quote