View Single Post
  #17  
Old 23rd February 2009, 09:40 PM
Ricky T Ricky T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SYD and (sometimes) MEL
Posts: 129
Default

I believe both carriers are fairly adaptable in terms of find the suitable aircraft that would minimise the amount of empty seats and thus the cost of flying them empty.

I recently flew from SYD to BNE with QF (on 7/2) which was originally scheduled to be a B763 when I booked the flights. Sometime later, I noticed the flight has been downgraded to a B73H which was fine as I would imagine there aren't that wouldn't be that many people travelling on a Saturday afternoon. When I arrived at the gate to board, I was even more surprised when our flight is actually going to be operated by a B734.

In the end, there was 143 pax on board which would justify the B734/B73H but perhaps not the B763.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Murray
If we're looking to slam either carrier for not carrying sufficient "bot-botts on seats" I'm sure we can find plenty of city pairs to support the slandering of both major airline groups.
A good example I could think of is SYD-CBR, especially for QF.
__________________
Upcoming flights

None
Reply With Quote