Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 3rd November 2008, 06:59 AM
Justin L Justin L is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 757
Default Pressure to let foreign airlines fly domestic

This one will be interesting...

http://www.smh.com.au/news/news/let-...560645337.html

Quote:
Pressure to let foreign airlines fly domestic
Mark Davis Political Correspondent
November 3, 2008

FOREIGN airlines would be allowed to fly domestic passengers between Australia's big capital cities to improve competition in the aviation industry under reforms being pushed by the Federal Government's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

In a submission to a Government review of aviation policy, the department is arguing for a significant freeing up of the complex web of trade agreements and local regulations which limit competition on international and domestic air routes.

It wants the Government to negotiate deals with other countries by which their carriers would be allowed to carry domestic passengers inside Australia, in return for Qantas and other Australian carriers being given the same rights in other countries.

But the proposal is being strenuously resisted by Qantas and Virgin Blue, which have warned it would allow international airlines to "cherry pick" busy routes like Sydney to Melbourne and Sydney to Brisbane, undermining the viability of less profitable regional services.

The debate has been triggered by a Government policy review on everything from regulation of international air services to tackling shortages of skilled workers.

The Transport Minister, Anthony Albanese, is about to release an aviation green paper and wants a white paper by the middle of next year to set out a long-term policy framework for the future of the industry.

The DFAT submission to the review adopts an unusually strong pro-competition position on international and domestic passenger air services, a stance which is likely to be at odds with that of Mr Albanese's own department.

In the Canberra bureaucracy, DFAT is responsible for trade policy and for negotiating almost all of Australia's multilateral, regional and bilateral international trade agreements.

But Mr Albanese's department is in charge of the complex agreements with other countries that determine which airlines can fly to and from Australia, where Australian airlines can fly internationally, and how much competition is allowed on international and domestic routes.

DFAT's submission says removing restrictions on flights between countries provides benefits for consumers and industries which rely on the aviation sector by allowing competition among airlines on price, convenience, destinations and service quality.

It says that even though Australia had negotiated so-called "open skies" agreements with countries like the US, Britain and Singapore, these still contained restrictions on airline services.

The submission also calls for other reforms, including:

- Allowing more foreign airlines to operate on the Australia-US route which is currently effectively restricted to Qantas, Virgin's V Australia international carrier and United Airlines.

- Lifting the 49 per cent foreign ownership cap on Qantas.

-Allowing foreign-owned but Australian-based airlines to fly on international routes in competition with Qantas.
__________________
ABQ ABX ACV ADD ADL AKL ALB AMA AMS ANC ARN ATH ATL AUA AUH AUS AVL AVV AZA BCN BDL BFL BGO BGR BHD BHM BHQ BIL BIS BKI BKK BLD BLI BLV BNA BNE BOG BOI BOJ BOS BSB BTR BUF BUD BUR BWI BZE BZN CAI CBR CGK CHC CHS CLE CLT CMH CNS CNX COS CPH CPT CTG CTS CUE CUN CUZ CVG CXF CZM DAL DBO DCA DEN DFW DLH DOH DRW DSM DTW DUD DUR DXB ECP ELP EUG EWR EYW EZE FAI FAR FAT FCA FCO FLG FLL FNL FNT FRA FRS FSD FU'K FWA GCN GDL GDN GEG GGW GIG GJT GOT GRI GRR GRU GSP GTF GUA GVA GYE HAM HAN HBA HBE HEL HHH HKD HKG HLZ HND HNL HOU HRL HSV HVB IAD IAH ICN ICT IDA IND INV ISP IST ITM ITO JAB JAX JFK JNB JNU JOG JTR KEF KGC KIX KMI KMJ KMQ KOA KRK KTN KUL LAS LAX LBB LBE LEJ LFT LGA LGB LHR LIH LIM LIN LRD LST MAD MAF MAO MCI MCO MCT MCY MDE MDT MDW MEL MEM MEX MFE MFR MHU MIA MID MKE MNL MOB MOT MQL MRY MSN MSP MSY MTJ MTY MUC MVD MXP MZT NAN NAS NRT NTL OAG OAK OGG OKA OKC OMA OME ONT OOL ORD OSL OTZ OUI PAE PBG PDX PEK PER PHL PHX PIA PIT PLO PLZ PNH PSC PSG PSP PTY PVD PVG PVR PVU RAP RDD RDM RDU REC REP RIC RIX RNO ROC RSW SAL SAN SAT SAV SBA SBD SBN SBP SCK SCL SDF SDU SEA SFO SGF SGN SGU SHA SHV SIN SIT SJC SJD SJO SJU SLC SMF SMX SNA SOF SSA STL STS SUN SYD SYO SYR TIJ TLL TMW TPA TPE TSV TUL TUS TWF TYS VAR VIE VNO VPS WAW WDH WGA WLG WRG WVB XIY XNA YEG YHM YHZ YKM YOW YQB YQG YQM YTZ YUL YUM YVR YWG YXE YYC YYJ YYT YYZ ZRH

Next Trips:
10-29APR LAS-LAX-SYD-ADL-MEL-ADL-KGC-ADL-MEL-SYD-LAX-LAS AA/QF/VA
02-05MAY LAS-ATL-LIT-LAS WN
11-12MAY LAS-DEN/CYS-DEN-LAS UA
18-19MAY LAS-DFW-BRO/HOU-LAS AA/WN
25-27MAY LAS-GEG/MSO-LAS WN/G4
31MAY-03JUN LAS-JFK-LAS DL/B6
08-09JUN LAS-PDX-LAS AS
21-24JUN LAS-GJT-LAS G4
04-08JUL LAS-SEA-ANC-ADQ-ANC-SEA-LAS AS
17-18AUG LAS-SEA-KTN-SEA-LAS AS
29AUG-03SEP LAS-MSP-TVC-DFW-LAS SY/AA
28-29SEP LAS-DEN-LAS UA
08-11NOV LAS-EWR/BTV-ORD-LAS UA
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 3rd November 2008, 08:54 AM
Jon Harris Jon Harris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 150
Default

UA does not have full traffic rights on the SYD-MEL tag - it can only carry pax that will continue their journey on UA's services to LAX and SFO however they can stop in SYD and it doesn't have to be an immediate connection. TG has the same set up for their SYD-BNE. MH has no traffic rights at all on the SYD-BNE.

QF's traffic rights on the LAX-JFK tag is the same as UA's on SYD-MEL.

For a while just after AN's collapse in 2001, UA had full traffic rights on the SYD-MEL - I remember their $50.00 fares in Y and $150 in C and $200 in F.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 3rd November 2008, 09:18 AM
Justin L Justin L is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Harris View Post
UA does not have full traffic rights on the SYD-MEL tag - it can only carry pax that will continue their journey on UA's services to LAX and SFO however they can stop in SYD and it doesn't have to be an immediate connection. TG has the same set up for their SYD-BNE. MH has no traffic rights at all on the SYD-BNE.

QF's traffic rights on the LAX-JFK tag is the same as UA's on SYD-MEL.

For a while just after AN's collapse in 2001, UA had full traffic rights on the SYD-MEL - I remember their $50.00 fares in Y and $150 in C and $200 in F.
I believe PR also has similar rights to UA and TG for SYD-MEL vv.
__________________
ABQ ABX ACV ADD ADL AKL ALB AMA AMS ANC ARN ATH ATL AUA AUH AUS AVL AVV AZA BCN BDL BFL BGO BGR BHD BHM BHQ BIL BIS BKI BKK BLD BLI BLV BNA BNE BOG BOI BOJ BOS BSB BTR BUF BUD BUR BWI BZE BZN CAI CBR CGK CHC CHS CLE CLT CMH CNS CNX COS CPH CPT CTG CTS CUE CUN CUZ CVG CXF CZM DAL DBO DCA DEN DFW DLH DOH DRW DSM DTW DUD DUR DXB ECP ELP EUG EWR EYW EZE FAI FAR FAT FCA FCO FLG FLL FNL FNT FRA FRS FSD FU'K FWA GCN GDL GDN GEG GGW GIG GJT GOT GRI GRR GRU GSP GTF GUA GVA GYE HAM HAN HBA HBE HEL HHH HKD HKG HLZ HND HNL HOU HRL HSV HVB IAD IAH ICN ICT IDA IND INV ISP IST ITM ITO JAB JAX JFK JNB JNU JOG JTR KEF KGC KIX KMI KMJ KMQ KOA KRK KTN KUL LAS LAX LBB LBE LEJ LFT LGA LGB LHR LIH LIM LIN LRD LST MAD MAF MAO MCI MCO MCT MCY MDE MDT MDW MEL MEM MEX MFE MFR MHU MIA MID MKE MNL MOB MOT MQL MRY MSN MSP MSY MTJ MTY MUC MVD MXP MZT NAN NAS NRT NTL OAG OAK OGG OKA OKC OMA OME ONT OOL ORD OSL OTZ OUI PAE PBG PDX PEK PER PHL PHX PIA PIT PLO PLZ PNH PSC PSG PSP PTY PVD PVG PVR PVU RAP RDD RDM RDU REC REP RIC RIX RNO ROC RSW SAL SAN SAT SAV SBA SBD SBN SBP SCK SCL SDF SDU SEA SFO SGF SGN SGU SHA SHV SIN SIT SJC SJD SJO SJU SLC SMF SMX SNA SOF SSA STL STS SUN SYD SYO SYR TIJ TLL TMW TPA TPE TSV TUL TUS TWF TYS VAR VIE VNO VPS WAW WDH WGA WLG WRG WVB XIY XNA YEG YHM YHZ YKM YOW YQB YQG YQM YTZ YUL YUM YVR YWG YXE YYC YYJ YYT YYZ ZRH

Next Trips:
10-29APR LAS-LAX-SYD-ADL-MEL-ADL-KGC-ADL-MEL-SYD-LAX-LAS AA/QF/VA
02-05MAY LAS-ATL-LIT-LAS WN
11-12MAY LAS-DEN/CYS-DEN-LAS UA
18-19MAY LAS-DFW-BRO/HOU-LAS AA/WN
25-27MAY LAS-GEG/MSO-LAS WN/G4
31MAY-03JUN LAS-JFK-LAS DL/B6
08-09JUN LAS-PDX-LAS AS
21-24JUN LAS-GJT-LAS G4
04-08JUL LAS-SEA-ANC-ADQ-ANC-SEA-LAS AS
17-18AUG LAS-SEA-KTN-SEA-LAS AS
29AUG-03SEP LAS-MSP-TVC-DFW-LAS SY/AA
28-29SEP LAS-DEN-LAS UA
08-11NOV LAS-EWR/BTV-ORD-LAS UA
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd November 2008, 03:22 PM
Jack B Jack B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 422
Default

Have foreign airlines operated domestic flights out of Sydney before

if so, what ones?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 3rd November 2008, 04:56 PM
James R James R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 48
Default

The BA9 and BA10 used to continue on to/from Melbourne.

I'd assume you could previously purchase domestic tickets on these sectors?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 3rd November 2008, 08:18 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

I think if you searched for which airlines operated here during the pilot strike days, you'd find a host of foreigners doing domestics.

Air Canada is one that I think was here...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 4th November 2008, 05:28 AM
Andrew P's Avatar
Andrew P Andrew P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: near the old NDB at West Pymble and near RPLR
Posts: 749
Default

CX also has limited rights ADL-MEL & CNS-BNE

Banjo
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 4th November 2008, 07:45 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Sounds like allowing this to happen could open a real can of worms and set a dangerous precedent. If this ever happened there would be no going back.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 4th November 2008, 08:33 AM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN View Post
Sounds like allowing this to happen could open a real can of worms and set a dangerous precedent. If this ever happened there would be no going back.

What's "dangerous" about it Nick?
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 4th November 2008, 03:56 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Setting a precedent such as this is dangerous. If everything goes to the dogs and foreign carriers take over the domestic market you can't just turn around and tell them to go. Once they are in, they are in.

There has to be some sort of protection offered by this government for Australian business. Something the Rudd government has a lacklustre history in. The Australian marketplace is constantly under attack from overseas interests, in almost every sector. The last thing we should be supporting is yet another way for foreign companies to muscle in on Australia.

I find it very un-Australian to be supporting and assisting overseas business to profit from Australian customers when we could be promoting a home grown business instead. Personally I always prefer to choose a home grown business to deal with over one that is under foreign ownership to help support Australian business.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement