Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th October 2011, 01:16 PM
Steve Crook Steve Crook is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 192
Default Japan / Australia Concludes Open-Skies Agreement

I saw this thread on airlineroute.net. What exactly does it mean and what possible changes to services between Australia and Japan might reult?


Japan / Australia Concludes Open-Skies Agreement
by JL
Japan and Australia last week (27SEP11-29SEP11) has an open-skies deal, due to be in effect as early as Summer 2013.

Details:

*Open-Skies in effect as early as Summer 2013 when Tokyo Narita Airport annual slots increases to 270000 per year

*Restrictions of 5th freedom rights removed for Australian carriers, excluding Tokyo Airports.

*Service to/from Australia is now possible out of Tokyo Haneda between 2200 and 0600 hrs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th October 2011, 01:50 PM
Brock Little's Avatar
Brock Little Brock Little is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 484
Default

This effectively means (correct me if I'm wrong) that airlines are legally allowed to operate domestic tag-on services in foreign countries - for example Qantas can do a SYD-KIX-CTS (New Chitose) service and sell domestic tickets on KIX-CTS to the Japanese public. Likewise, JAL can do the same with selling domestic tickets on SYD-MEL if they do that tag-on to their NRT-SYD service. As these fifth freedom rights are removed for everything bar Tokyo Airports (mainly HND and NRT) an airline can fly direct to these airports but not sell tickets through to tag-on destinations. Of course Qantas can get past this by using Jetstar Japan for connecting flights.

An example of an airline not having fifth freedom rights is United on their SYD-MEL tag-on. Those seats are reserved for only UA pax wishing to go through to MEL who have flown on the SFO or LAX service - not any domestic passengers.

The removal of these restrictions gives secondary airports more of a spotlight, and allows for larger international aircraft into those airports. Maybe when fifth freedom restrictions are removed for Japanese airlines we may see the likes of JAL back in MEL and BNE!
__________________
Photos

JetPhotos.net (1381 Photos)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th October 2011, 03:42 PM
JoshuaD JoshuaD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6
Default

Not quite Brock, the open skies agreement allows for unlimited capacity from either country carriers to fly routes between the two countries. They can sell seats between domestic points, only if part of an international journey, and they cant just fill up between BNE-SYD etc. The whole open skies thing is designed to boost air activity, and by doing so, stimulate the economy and acces of each country. Basically, ahat it will mean for most people is a greater choice of airlines, flights, and potentially some extra cities, however, that last point is probably doubtful
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th October 2011, 05:03 AM
Justin L Justin L is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 757
Default

Brock, fifth freedom rights allow airlines to fly onto a third country and sell seats on that sector. For example, if JQ flew SYD-KIX-ICN, it could sell tickets on the KIX-ICN leg as its own sector. The first post mentioned the fifth freedom rights restriction had been removed for Australian carriers, I'm not sure of the status of fifth freedom rights for Japanese carriers in Australia though, for sectors such as SYD-AKL, etc.

This is similar to what QF dow now through SIN (and until the recent changes BKK and HKG), do with AKL-LAX and had done for SFO-YVR in the past.

FYI, JQ previously already had tag on flights in Japan - the now defunct NGO-KIX tag on.
__________________
ABQ ABX ACV ADD ADL AKL ALB AMA AMS ANC ARN ATH ATL AUA AUH AUS AVL AVV AZA BCN BDL BFL BGO BGR BHD BHM BHQ BIL BIS BKI BKK BLD BLI BLV BNA BNE BOG BOI BOJ BOS BSB BTR BUF BUD BUR BWI BZE BZN CAI CBR CGK CHC CHS CLE CLT CMH CNS CNX COS CPH CPT CTG CTS CUE CUN CUZ CVG CXF CZM DAL DBO DCA DEN DFW DLH DOH DRW DSM DTW DUD DUR DXB ECP ELP EUG EWR EYW EZE FAI FAR FAT FCA FCO FLG FLL FNL FNT FRA FRS FSD FU'K FWA GCN GDL GDN GEG GGW GIG GJT GOT GRI GRR GRU GSP GTF GUA GVA GYE HAM HAN HBA HBE HEL HHH HKD HKG HLZ HND HNL HOU HRL HSV HVB IAD IAH ICN ICT IDA IND INV ISP IST ITM ITO JAB JAX JFK JNB JNU JOG JTR KEF KGC KIX KMI KMJ KMQ KOA KRK KTN KUL LAS LAX LBB LBE LEJ LFT LGA LGB LHR LIH LIM LIN LRD LST MAD MAF MAO MCI MCO MCT MCY MDE MDT MDW MEL MEM MEX MFE MFR MHU MIA MID MKE MNL MOB MOT MQL MRY MSN MSP MSY MTJ MTY MUC MVD MXP MZT NAN NAS NRT NTL OAG OAK OGG OKA OKC OMA OME ONT OOL ORD OSL OTZ OUI PAE PBG PDX PEK PER PHL PHX PIA PIT PLO PLZ PNH PSC PSG PSP PTY PVD PVG PVR PVU RAP RDD RDM RDU REC REP RIC RIX RNO ROC RSW SAL SAN SAT SAV SBA SBD SBN SBP SCK SCL SDF SDU SEA SFO SGF SGN SGU SHA SHV SIN SIT SJC SJD SJO SJU SLC SMF SMX SNA SOF SSA STL STS SUN SYD SYO SYR TIJ TLL TMW TPA TPE TSV TUL TUS TWF TYS VAR VIE VNO VPS WAW WDH WGA WLG WRG WVB XIY XNA YEG YHM YHZ YKM YOW YQB YQG YQM YTZ YUL YUM YVR YWG YXE YYC YYJ YYT YYZ ZRH

Next Trips:
29APR SYD-LAX-LAS AA
02-05MAY LAS-ATL-LIT-LAS WN
11-12MAY LAS-DEN/CYS-DEN-LAS UA
18-19MAY LAS-DFW-BRO/HOU-LAS AA/WN
25-27MAY LAS-GEG/MSO-LAS WN/G4
31MAY-03JUN LAS-JFK-LAS DL/B6
08-09JUN LAS-PDX-LAS AS
21-24JUN LAS-GJT-LAS G4
04-08JUL LAS-SEA-ANC-ADQ-ANC-SEA-LAS AS
17-18AUG LAS-SEA-KTN-SEA-LAS AS
29AUG-03SEP LAS-MSP-TVC-DFW-LAS SY/AA
28-29SEP LAS-DEN-LAS UA
08-11NOV LAS-EWR/BTV-ORD-LAS UA
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th October 2011, 06:13 AM
Brock Little's Avatar
Brock Little Brock Little is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 484
Default

Thanks guys for clearing that up...but with an Open-Skies deal between two countries, it would be fair enough to say that Australian and Japanese carriers will be able to operate without restrictions into the other country, wouldn't it?
__________________
Photos

JetPhotos.net (1381 Photos)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th October 2011, 08:11 AM
James G. James G. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 20
Default

Could this possibly lead ANA to begin services to Australia? Maybe with the new 787?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17th October 2011, 08:22 AM
Rowan McKeever Rowan McKeever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,653
Default

Essentially Brock, yeah. The only restrictions are that an Aussie carrier can't exercise 5th freedom rights through NRT or HND, and that all ops by an Aussie carrier through HND must be between 2200-0600L.

Would be good to see ANA... 787 or otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17th October 2011, 10:33 AM
Will H Will H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 199
Default

In terms of what the agreement means, you may find handy this article (disclosure: I wrote it): http://www.centreforaviation.com/ana...g-market-60083

In short, don't expect any changes. There's nothing in the agreement that would incentive ANA to operate flights now more so than before.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement