Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th February 2009, 10:27 PM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default BK Tower restrictions

OK, so what's going on here then???

Quote:
C48/09 REVIEW C43/09
CIRCUIT OPS RESTRICTED
DAILY BTN 2230-2330 AND 0430-0530
ACFT NUMBERS REDUCED TO NO MORE THAN 4 DUE WORKLOAD DISTRIBUTION
FROM 02 040507 TO 04 300530
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5th February 2009, 08:59 AM
Phil M Phil M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Default

Due to the lack of staff the circuit frequency will is combined with the the arrival and departure frequency so 1 less person is required in the cabin.

As a result, only 4 can be in the circuit due to workload of the Controller and frequency congestion.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 5th February 2009, 09:54 AM
Jarrad Wadmore Jarrad Wadmore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Default

It's not just BK but also out at Parafield too:

RESTRICTED CIRCUIT OPS AVBL AND START APPROVAL REQUIRED
DAILY 0630-0730
DUE STAFF SHORTAGE
FROM 02 010730 TO 04 040730 EST

Asa recruitment must be slow!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th February 2009, 10:11 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

I don't think it's necessarily 'slow', but it does take time to train them. Also there have been the usual retirement aged folks going as well as attractive overseas options.

Another thing that's becoming a semi-regular event is delays on departure due to staff shortages. No doubt the airlines are getting rather cranky with AsA management.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th February 2009, 11:31 AM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default

Glad I don't fly out of BK any more.

BK operators can't be happy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5th February 2009, 11:39 AM
Matt_L Matt_L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam P. View Post
Glad I don't fly out of BK any more.

BK operators can't be happy.
Indeed, Amnita Hennesy- owner of Clamback and Hennesy flying school reckons this one act is losing her about 50% of daily profit- see her blog on clahen website.

I flew out of BK last week on Wednesday and cant believe the shift that has occured since i started training there in 2005. There was a 152 at runway centre saying he was ready at runway left- he got a hammering from tower.

It seems the controllers are fed up of some of the pilots flying into BK- student pilots no doubt which often dont comply with regulations/respond to calls even. Another 152 doing a go around on circuit runway (11R) with about 8 in the circuit failed to notify tower. When Tower realized the 152 had already reached late upwind and was turning crosswind right into the path of a cherokee- 3 calls went unheeded by the pilot of the 152 until finally he responded to the sequencing instructions. Thankfully tower was there to tell the 152 to extend the upwind because the two planes came very close- me being on downwind at the time so saw it all.

I just think reducing the planes to 4 will cause bottlenecks of planes rushing on the ground to join circuit, and others coming back from the training area wanting to join circuit which could also be a problem.

Anyways just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th February 2009, 11:43 AM
Brenden S Brenden S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,067
Default

What about flying down to YWOL or out to Camden?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th February 2009, 12:52 PM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default

Quote:
out to Camden?

SSHH!!! They might hear you, and then it'll be just as bad out there!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 5th February 2009, 01:16 PM
Matt_L Matt_L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam P. View Post
SSHH!!! They might hear you, and then it'll be just as bad out there!!!
From what ive been seeing on PPRUNE,

Camden is becoming far more busier now Hoxton Park is closed, and ctaf calls are hard to come by with all the frequency traffic

But with the new CTAF procedures theres a fine for not calling all the relevant legs- i believe?

Go figure!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 5th February 2009, 03:55 PM
Chris W Chris W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_L View Post
From what ive been seeing on PPRUNE,

Camden is becoming far more busier now Hoxton Park is closed, and ctaf calls are hard to come by with all the frequency traffic

But with the new CTAF procedures theres a fine for not calling all the relevant legs- i believe?

Go figure!
And who polices that? Will ASA with all of their staff send someone out to listen to Camden CTAF or does CASA send their wonderful staff. At least with the latter option the fine will take a year to get to you or not at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement