Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 2nd November 2011, 11:56 AM
David Knudsen David Knudsen is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 714
Default

I don't think Andrew's trying to say Qantas would have done a better or worse job, but I too am curious as to whether or not it's a standard procedure to complete a flight with a hydraulics issue or put down at the closest port.
__________________
- Dave

Jetphotos.net Shots
Airliners.net Shots
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 2nd November 2011, 12:16 PM
Rowan McKeever Rowan McKeever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,653
Default

G'day Dave & Andrew

Apologies for coming across that way. My point is really just that on all the information I've seen from the LO incident it appears the crew assessed the risk as being imminent only during the landing phase and not during the cruise. In that case it makes no difference where the aircraft lands & so I imagine any airline would prefer the 'most efficient' option which would be to bring the aircraft & crew & passengers home. Sorry again for sounding accusatory Andrew.

Cheers
Rowan
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 2nd November 2011, 12:50 PM
Daniel M Daniel M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 329
Default

Holy moly those photos are awesome, particularly the first one !
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 2nd November 2011, 12:51 PM
Daniel M Daniel M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 329
Default

Also, is there no gravity extension system for the gear on the 767 ?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 2nd November 2011, 12:54 PM
Rowan McKeever Rowan McKeever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,653
Default

My favourite's the 3rd one... just has a 'meant-to-be' look about it!!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 2nd November 2011, 01:11 PM
Grahame Hutchison's Avatar
Grahame Hutchison Grahame Hutchison is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney's Eastern Suburbs - View From Bondi To Jibbon Point And Bravo 10 South
Posts: 8,533
Default

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7226626

This image shows it as an almost perfect three point landing.

Things may have been different in a strong crosswind.
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 2nd November 2011, 03:52 PM
Darren Butterworth's Avatar
Darren Butterworth Darren Butterworth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Default

Brilliant photos
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 2nd November 2011, 08:06 PM
James S. James S. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nope
Posts: 184
Default

Bloody brilliant job from those LOT pilots, good on them, that's what their training was for, although it's pretty amazing that everything failed for them not to even be able to get that gear down through gravity or backup systems!
__________________
Sigh.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 3rd November 2011, 06:48 AM
albert vasquez albert vasquez is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9
Default

Hi
For more photos and videos check the link below out.
For those of you who speak polish heaps to read, for the others enjoy the pics vids.

http://www.tvn24.pl/13547,2476295,0,...u,galeria.html

Anyone able to answer what the problem could've been. From what they are saying on tvn24.pl it appears all of the landing gear deployment systems had failed for electrical, hydraulic and gravity assisted.

Albert
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 4th November 2011, 11:00 AM
Fred C Fred C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 483
Default

Cannot help with the reason why the gear didn't extend. I am sure that will be revealed with time. I am sure Boeing would like to know why one of their aeroplanes has landed on its belly.

As for landing gear operation on a 767.............

Normal operation is you operate a lever in the flight deck which via cables operates a valve in the main gear wheel well. This then ports hydraulic fluid to doors and gear actuators in a specific sequence to successfully extend and lock the gear down.

It is believed that this aircraft had trouble with the centre hydraulic system on departure. This is the system that operates the landing gear.

Alternate operation of the gear is via an electric motor and a cable system to each of the gears. This unlocks the gear doors and allows the gear to freefall into the down and locked position.
__________________
Regards,

Fred
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement