Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 19th November 2008, 07:28 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,402
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty H View Post
From looking at the images on the news, looks as though its damage to the randome on one, and damage to the left leading edge slats near the winglet on the other.
I saw the same news images. How the ?!*?! can you tow a 747 head on into another aircraft, or tow another aircraft so that its wing whacks another aircraft head on the nose?

It has to be rotten luck for Qantas on any objective view - they can't take a trick lately and have muted a lot of the marketing momentum that they could otherwise have expected from the A380 inaugural services.

No doubt Lindsay Fox will be hearing some choice language from Alan Joyce ...
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19th November 2008, 07:55 AM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Argy View Post
I saw the same news images. How the ?!*?! can you tow a 747 head on into another aircraft, or tow another aircraft so that its wing whacks another aircraft head on the nose?

It has to be rotten luck for Qantas on any objective view - they can't take a trick lately and have muted a lot of the marketing momentum that they could otherwise have expected from the A380 inaugural services.

No doubt Lindsay Fox will be hearing some choice language from Alan Joyce ...
Obviously a misjudgment by the tug driver on how close the wing was, would have thought though there may have been someone 'marshalling' when towing in such close proximty to another aircraft.

Would have a ground engineer been plugged in possibly???

I dont think Joyce can say much to Fox unless Fox was driving the tug.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19th November 2008, 11:35 AM
Graham B Graham B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 24
Default

How will the journo's get the "passengers feared for their lives" line into into this story?
__________________
Upcoming flights
July 09
SYD-BKK-LHR QF1 LHR-IST BA676 IST-BUD MA201 BUD-VCE MA420 FCO-LHR BA 559 LHR-SIN BA11 SIN-SYD QF32 (A380)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19th November 2008, 12:31 PM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhys Xanthis View Post
Umm...qf might just want to look at selling OJK.

i swear it's cursed!
I'd be selling OJH before OJK (Bangkok incident)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 20th November 2008, 06:20 AM
Mike Scott Mike Scott is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HNL Hawaii USA
Posts: 230
Default

I guess QF must have outsourced the tug driving contract.

MS
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 20th November 2008, 11:03 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Last week or this week Mike?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 20th November 2008, 05:03 PM
Trevor Sinclair's Avatar
Trevor Sinclair Trevor Sinclair is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Inner West
Posts: 105
Default

Yeh, can't win a trick in 2008! Imagine the paperwork that has to follow an incident like this, here are some stills...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 20th November 2008, 05:15 PM
Jamie D Jamie D is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 205
Default

appears from the photos that the other aircraft involved was vh-ojm
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 20th November 2008, 06:39 PM
Raymond Rowe's Avatar
Raymond Rowe Raymond Rowe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 537
Default

A real nice insurance claim there and looks close enough for a boeing crash crew call out. Looks to be a fair amount of damage to VH-OJM wing.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 20th November 2008, 06:48 PM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

Looks like OJK was the 'innocent' one this time around. As I said in a previous post, surprised they didnt have a marshaller or ground engineer keeping an eye on the tow when they knew it was within close proximity to another aircraft.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement