Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 3rd April 2009, 08:43 PM
Stephen B Stephen B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Talking "Operational Requirements"

Hi all,

I saw the only slightly one sided story about Tiger on 7 tonight. We flew with them last year, and while everything turned out OK for us, they did change the time of our flight 4 times in the months before the day, with it eventually landing in Melbourne 2 minutes before we were due to depart Canberra.

I'm wondering if someone could please explain exactly what are these famous "operational requirements" we always hear about as justifications for airlines changing their schedules? I can understand particularly with older fleets aircraft can go unserviceable at times, just like any other vehicle, but that usually causes a last minute re-scheduling, not several changes over several weeks.

Not picking on Tiger here, but isn't their whole fleet brand new? Surely they don't have very many mechanical issues? I've flown Qantas and Virgin many times before, and (fortunately I guess) never once had a flight time changed.

Personally I'd be happy to fly with them if I had no particular time I had to be at my destination, but I will never fly with them to a meeting or connecting flight. But only because of "operational requirements" of course!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th April 2009, 08:10 AM
Owen H Owen H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 365
Default

Operational Requirements is a general purpose excuse

Could be anything... turn around times having staff at the airport for less time, earlier turn around meaning they can squeeze another flight in for the aircraft for the day, that sorta stuff.

It could be one was out for planned maintenance and they had to rejig their schedule.

Or they just decided that the earlier time sounded better.

So, basically.. could have been anything!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th April 2009, 10:16 AM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default

Quote:
their whole fleet brand new? Surely they don't have very many mechanical issues?
New aeroplanes don't necessarily break down less often - might be a different sort of breakdown to older ones. This is more a cause of 'on the day' schedule changes (ie delays, cancellations, diversions) than 'in advance' ones.

Advance schedule changes may also come from a rejigging of aircraft cycles.
For example: under the 'old' schedule you might have had Aircraft 001 going A to B to A to C to A and Aircraft 002 doing A to C to A to B to A. Under the 'new' one 001 goes A to B to A to B to A and 002 does A to C to A to C to A. Still the same number of flights to each port, but if the sector lengths are different obviously the timings will change for the later ones.

I do Like Owen's explanation though: "Operational Requirments" as the general purpose excuse. It sounds technical enough that it works for most passengers!

Last edited by Adam P.; 4th April 2009 at 10:19 AM. Reason: adding bits
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th April 2009, 10:25 AM
David M David M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YPAD
Posts: 240
Default

Operational Requirements = Your flight attendant slept in due to the daylight savings time change.

David.M.

Thankfully I've never slept in.
__________________
E&OE
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th April 2009, 11:07 AM
Greg McDonald Greg McDonald is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 723
Default

Ya gotta laugh....this is from todays news:

Quote:
JETSTAR is refusing to give any details over why it cancelled a flight out of Darwin yesterday morning, causing 150 people to change their travel plans.
The 2am flight to Melbourne was not full but the airline denied it was cancelled to cut costs, saying "operational requirements" were behind the change.

The inconvenience came after their flight had earlier been changed from Saturday morning to yesterday - also without explanation.

Jetstar spokeswoman Andrea Wait told the Northern Territory News that the plane did not make it to Darwin.

But she said there was nothing wrong with the aircraft and there was no scheduling clash.

"It was an operational requirement that we had to cancel the flight," she said.

Asked several times what that meant, Ms Wait would only repeat it was an "operational requirement".

She said 150 seats were booked from a capacity of 177, but denied this was the reason for cancellation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th April 2009, 08:36 AM
David M David M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YPAD
Posts: 240
Default

Might have something to do with the fact that two Tiger a/c were sitting in ADL (at the old domestic deconstruction site) yesterday around noon!

David.M.
__________________
E&OE
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement