|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Qantas boss Alan Joyce wins 71 per cent, $2m pay hike
I think this is an absolute bl00dy joke and if he had any kind of conscience he should give the entire rise to charity....Try to destroy an iconic airline and get a huge payrise for it!!! All I can hope is that this hastens his demise.
From news.com.au: Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Look around, Greg. Airlines everywhere are bleeding and Qantas is increasing its profit to half that of the mighty EK.
People need to get over this destroying Qantas notion. Not only is it unfounded and does not own up to the reality of the marketplace, the problems were set long before Joyce. He's the first to do something about it, partly because of more urgent needs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
CEO remuneration
With all due respect Will, the current CEO could have ordered fuel efficient 777 aircraft as CX, SQ & EK have & are.The majority of the passenger 747's should have been sold some time ago (like CX & SQ).
The CEO is ultimately responsible for the huge Freight cartel fines recently served on Qantas. Most of the current years profit is derived from QF domestic so based on Joyce's logic for return on investment, the first 787's should go there to replace aged 767's & compete with Virgin for the business market. It is a flawed plan to have premium A320 a/c trying to compete against Singapore Airlines wide body aircraft. The current CEO has wasted millions of dollars at Jetstar Pacific & is only just supposedly making a small profit after 5 years of losses in Singapore. He is contracting the Qantas network because of inefficient aircraft on the route. Qantas is the only International Airline that can lose money with an 82% load factor. What does that say about yield management or owning the wrong aircraft type? That wonderful profit also comprised $95 million from Rolls Royce as compensation.How much was derived from compensation for late deliveries of 787's? The current management is obsessed with the low cost airline strategy. Qantas needs a CEO like Fyfe from Air New Zealand who engages his staff and isn't in conflict with his unions. I think Qantas staff engagement is at the lowest level ever & that is directly related to poor management. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Two lines seem to have been missed or glossed over in the article above. Namely
"But the airline pointed out that Mr Joyce's final salary package included share-based bonuses - that hinge on meeting performance targets - that he may never received. A spokesman said that the airline considered his final vested salary as more realistic and this had declined from $3352 million in 2010 to $3.043 million this year." So his actual cash salary has dropped from (I assume $3352m is really $3.352m) to $3.043m (about 10%) but the whole package has been beefed up with "share based bonus that hinge on meeting performance targets" So in reality he has taken a cash pay cut and is gambling that the changes he and the board are making will result in the performance targets being met and the share price improving. Maybe the pilots etc need to do the same. Take a 10% pay cut and then put some faith in the board that the company will grow and prosper. Reckon that will happen? Nope. Last edited by Ash W; 8th September 2011 at 08:48 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
So if I understand this thread correctly Joyce is operating outside of the mandate of the QF board and should work for free? Is that correct?
The board is responsible for paying the cartel fines and for developing the culture that enabled that behaviour to develop, the board is responsible for the fleet mix, the board is responsible for where the 787 will go, the board is responsible for Jetstar Pacific and the board is responsible for setting executive renumeration. The board was also responsible for hiring Joyce and for the premium Asian airline strategy. Joyce's role is to present and execute on the board approved strategy. To try and blame Joyce for this shows a comprehensive lack of understanding on how public companies are run and if Qantas was really run as you have described Gary B then ASIC would be very interested as it would be a wholesale failure of corporate governance and the shareholders who elect the board would only have themselves to blame. Personally while I don't agree with many of the current directions of Qantas I have to admire Joyce for his ability to continue to execute on the direction of the board in the face of ongoing personal attacks (even taking 2 weeks of work to deal with aggressive prostate cancer). I think a lesser man would have forfeited quite some time ago. The fact that he is still there despite all of this shows a man of great depth in character which reflects the Australian spirit of old rather than the complaining, entitlement spirit of new. For that alone I think he earned every cent this year. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No one is worth $5M & no pilot is worth $0.5M.
No wonder QF is stuffed. It will all be JQ soon. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
No pilot worth $0.5M? Maybe not.... So tell us how much is he/she worth when ya strapped to your seat when everything is going to s#*t and one of the donks are on fire or whatever the problem and they eventually get you on the ground safely?
Last time I checked, CEOs don't get put through 3 to 5 vigorous checks a year to keep their job either. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Last time I checked pilots don't have to go through anywhere near the amount of s#*t that has been personally leveled at Alan Joyce.
__________________
'Flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.' - Douglas Adams (1952-2001) Last edited by Ray P.; 10th September 2011 at 11:14 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pilot's are worth every cent they are paid. Continuation of their career subject to passing the next medical.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What about Ambulance Paramedic,s and ER Nurse,s they are worth more than what they get paid which is peanuts compared to what pilots get.Also you dont hear them crying about pay and there job is alot more stressful as well.
|
|
|