|
|
|
#151
22nd December 2011, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
To be honest i think the only ones that can claim for physical injury are ones that were not seated.
Any one that was seated, knows as stated by almost every airline that they have their seat belt on, for this very reason.
__________________
Upcoming flights SQ216 12/02/12 PER SIN A333 SQ215 19/02/12 SIN PER A333 
|
|
#152
22nd December 2011, 10:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Faulty avionics was the cause
Not wearing a seat belt during cruise might be contributory negligence but it is not disentitling, especially given that there had been not a skeric of turbulence.
__________________
Philip
|
|
#153
22nd December 2011, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
At least 60 of the aircraft’s passengers were seated without their seat belts fastened at the time of the first pitch-down. Consistent with previous in-flight upset accidents, the injury rate, and injury severity, was substantially greater for those who were not seated or seated without their seat belts fastened.
Passengers are routinely reminded every flight to keep their seat belts fastened during flight whenever they are seated, but it appears some passengers routinely do not follow this advice. This investigation provided some insights into the types of passengers who may be more likely not to wear seat belts, but it also identified that there has been very little research conducted into this topic by the aviation industry
__________________
Upcoming flights SQ216 12/02/12 PER SIN A333 SQ215 19/02/12 SIN PER A333
|
|
#154
13th May 2017, 12:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bit of a look at the human side of the incident
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/good...10-gw26ae.html Also a good account of the concerns many pilots have of Airbus's computer priorities over humans design.
|
|
#155
13th May 2017, 10:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
ATSB questions still unanswered ...
__________________
Philip
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
