Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #421  
Old 29th January 2015, 04:15 PM
Greg Hyde Greg Hyde is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,945
Default

Sorry "efficient" was the word.

Why hasn't QF bought B777 ?
Reply With Quote
  #422  
Old 29th January 2015, 05:08 PM
Todd Hendry Todd Hendry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kirrawee
Posts: 311
Default

HAHAHAHA Greg. That's funny.
__________________
“When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it.”

Henry Ford.
Reply With Quote
  #423  
Old 29th January 2015, 08:01 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hyde View Post
Sorry "efficient" was the word.

Why hasn't QF bought B777 ?
Been discussed many times before.

When the 777 came out the models on offer were too big for domestic and too big for Asia (where the 767 was still king) and without legs to go to the US and from Asia to Europe.

By the time the LR's and ER's had come out Qantas had already decided to go for the A380 for long haul, added some 747ER's too, the smaller A330 for Asia and later ordered the 787 for domestic. Remembering the original 787 plan was 788's to JQ, then when 789's came these would replace JQ 788's which would go as is to Qantas for domestic to replace 767's.

Of course the A380 program was delayed which meant the 747's stayed longer than planned, the 787 was also delayed which in turn delayed the 767's being removed, and of course we have had the Qantas restructure which has resulted in orders for long haul aircraft being deferred or cancelled.

So whilst one could say in hindsight Qantas should have ordered the 777, specifically the 777-300ER simple fact is they made other fleet decisions that they felt were right at the time, repeat AT THE TIME. Of course even now Qantas may be able to use a couple of 777-300ER's, the fact is they would only need a couple for niche routes, so hardly worth introducing a new type into the fleet for just a few a/c is it? More so when you think there are now aircraft available in the 789, and even the A350-900 or -1000's that would better suit Qantas.
Reply With Quote
  #424  
Old 29th January 2015, 09:07 PM
Mark Grima Mark Grima is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 495
Default

Its great that this has been confirmed. The OJA deserves to be preserved and have many stories told and many youngsters learn many lessons. Being so accessible is an added bonus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark C View Post
That article has a heap of factual errors.
You can say that again! My head hurts from trying to read it..

The "no more than about ten minutes" comment hurts too!

I'm by no means a grammar expert, far far from it and guilty of many errors, but if that was published that's embarrassing!!

Cheers

M
__________________
http://flightdiary.net/MarkG

Last edited by Mark Grima; 29th January 2015 at 09:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #425  
Old 29th January 2015, 11:05 PM
Robert.M Robert.M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Wagga Wagga
Posts: 629
Default

Worst kept secret really. Going to see if I can fit in a trip to the Gong (depending on time and money).
Reply With Quote
  #426  
Old 30th January 2015, 01:12 PM
Thomas Collins Thomas Collins is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 161
Default

Actually, the fleet renewal back in 2000, was for A380's and B787's. Due to the B787 delay, Qantas took A330's as a stop-gap, hence the introduction of a new type into the fleet. These were offered by Airbus for a very good price, as Airbus's plans were to convert A330's to A350's down the track. Airbus wanted to move QF across to an all Airbus fleet.

Qantas went as far as evaluating the A320 when the B737 renewal program commenced with the -800's. At one stage both aircraft (A320 / B738) were in Sydney for Qantas evaluation, however QF continued with the B737 for various reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #427  
Old 4th February 2015, 05:42 PM
Patrick M Patrick M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 13
Default

Out of OJI, OJM and OEB, who will be the NEXT TO GO?
Reply With Quote
  #428  
Old 4th February 2015, 06:10 PM
Zac M's Avatar
Zac M Zac M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,409
Default

I would expect OJI as it is the only one in the old livery, however it could be any of the three, will all depend on cycles, when maintenance is due, etc.
__________________
Recent Flights:
26/10/24 QF1511 (YQS)
26/10/24 QF1504 (YQS)
26/10/24 QF1503 (YQS)
26/10/24 QF1500 (YQW)
14/10/24 QF1270 (X4A)
11/10/24 JQ655 (VGF)
29/09/24 QF1501 (YQS)
29/09/24 QF1562 (YQS)
Reply With Quote
  #429  
Old 4th February 2015, 08:29 PM
Brad Myer Brad Myer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 467
Default

OJI is next to go.

Then no further retirements with OJM and OEB hanging around.

QF can't afford to drop any more B744s if they still plan to operate the existing schedule plus the seasonal extras etc.
Reply With Quote
  #430  
Old 4th February 2015, 09:10 PM
Patrick M Patrick M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 13
Default

This is going to be very interesting to watch as the old 744s go, there may not be enough. I wonder if they'll decide to take at least some of the remaining 8 a380s and / or b789s. Would QF be interested in the two Skymarks a380 frames that they cancelled?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement