Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Spotting and Movements > Spotting and Movements
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th July 2012, 06:16 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default Fog event 25/7/12

Expect a few delays and diversions this morning.

It looks like my nightshift ended at just the right time!

Quote:
ATIS YSSY B 241951
APCH: EXP ILS APCH
RWY: 16L AND R FOR ARRS AND DEPS
OPR INFO: PARL RWY OPS IN PROG.
INDEPENDENT DEPARTURES IN PROG.
LOW VIS PROCS IN FORCE
ALL VEHICLES MUST CTC AN APPROPRIATE ATC FREQ
FOR TWY ENTRY CLR
WIND: 280/8
DW 5 KTS
+ RVR: RWY 16L: 225M, 250M, 275M.
RWY 16R: 375M, 325M, 400M
CLD: FEW 003
TMP: 10
QNH: 1023
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25th July 2012, 07:15 AM
Brock Little's Avatar
Brock Little Brock Little is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 484
Default

Brisbane has already had VS200, VA2, QF568, QF22, JL771, DL17, B-LEX (BBJ from HKG), UA863, QF12 and UA839.
Also EY450 is diverting to Melbourne.
__________________
Photos

JetPhotos.net (1381 Photos)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th July 2012, 08:45 AM
Noel White's Avatar
Noel White Noel White is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 272
Default

Cathay 111 has gone around three times so far and now heading to MEL.
__________________
Cheers,

Noel White
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th July 2012, 09:06 AM
George G George G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 95
Default

Watching flight radar.

SQ 221 got diverted to Melbourne...now its doing loops again on the way back.

Would suck to be a passenger on that one!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th July 2012, 09:14 AM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 453
Default

QF130 is being diverted to MEL.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th July 2012, 09:15 AM
Zac M's Avatar
Zac M Zac M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,372
Default

I was gonna ask if there was any diversions for Canberra, but I'm pretty sure we are fogged in down here as well
__________________
Recent Flights:
29/3/24 QF1509 (YQS)
29/3/24 QF1404 (LQF)
29/3/24 QF2078 (TQH)
29/3/24 QF945 (VXA)
17/3/24 QF1268 (X4A)
17/3/24 QF1267 (X4A)
1/3/24 QF1274 (X4A)
1/3/24 QF1269 (X4B)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th July 2012, 10:23 AM
David N David N is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 189
Default

Hi

Were the condition worst than using the 16R ILS Cat 1?

I heard BA and CX 111 report they needed a RVR of 550 metres, I think Asiana got in but the QF behind them went around.

BA got in after extending their downwind I believe until it improved past their minimum requirement.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th July 2012, 12:08 PM
Mick F Mick F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David N View Post
Were the condition worst than using the 16R ILS Cat 1?

I heard BA and CX 111 report they needed a RVR of 550 metres
That's got me interested, as it was always my belief (after holding an instrument rating for 9 years now) that the minimum vis required was the 800m's as listed for a Cat 1 ILS.

So I went in search for myself and discovered a new little tidbit that has been added sometime in the last few years.

The minima for the ILS at Sydney also has "550 RVR" after the 220ft and 0.8km vis.

AIP then add's this:

"Minimum visibility of 0.8km is required if instrumented RVR information in the threshold zone is not available"

So there you go, technology has lowered the minima just that little bit more in Sydney already, .

Mick
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th July 2012, 12:25 PM
Rob R Rob R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Default

Traffic holding started at 40 mins and then updated to 70 mins. We got 30 mins ground delay followed by another 60 mins in the air.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th July 2012, 12:29 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

They're funky things, those transmissometers. Accurate frequently updated readouts (every 3 seconds or so), plus it removes some of the risk for people like me because we don't have to do regular runway edge light counts to get an RVR; we still do regular runway inspections.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement