Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 30th January 2009, 11:55 PM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

From what I have been told by my mate who was on this flight, there were about five hours out from DRW and the alarms kept going off in the toilets, and crew started feeling unwell from fumes and they returned to DRW, there was no smoke or flames as reported in the media.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30th January 2009, 11:57 PM
Daniel G Daniel G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_L View Post
What Dan means is that a forced landing is often in aviation terms one which involves a plane losing its engine/engines say like a 172 and then landing in a paddock or even with an airliner where it is in immediate danger, rather then just a bad smell like in this case.
Thanks Matt. I'm not saying it wasn't serious, just not a forced landing in the true sense of the term.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31st January 2009, 12:52 AM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

Hi Marty

Where did your mate get his "five hours out from Darwin" thought ?

According to the leading post in this thread, (part quoted below), the aircraft returned to Darwin less than three hours after taking off.

".....At least three people were taken to hospital suffering smoke inhalation soon after the plane returned to Darwin International Airport at 2.10am (CST) today.

The Airbus A330 had taken off from the same airport at 11.15pm (CST) yesterday."

And Simon Moore, commercial manager of Strategic Aviation, said the plane was 40 minutes into the eight-hour flight when the crew noticed "a strong smell within the cabin''.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31st January 2009, 07:48 AM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby C View Post
Hi Marty

Where did your mate get his "five hours out from Darwin" thought ?

According to the leading post in this thread, (part quoted below), the aircraft returned to Darwin less than three hours after taking off.

".....At least three people were taken to hospital suffering smoke inhalation soon after the plane returned to Darwin International Airport at 2.10am (CST) today.

The Airbus A330 had taken off from the same airport at 11.15pm (CST) yesterday."

And Simon Moore, commercial manager of Strategic Aviation, said the plane was 40 minutes into the eight-hour flight when the crew noticed "a strong smell within the cabin''.

From his own mouth its what he told me, he is now in Kuwait the aircraft left 24hrs later.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 31st January 2009, 07:50 AM
David N David N is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel G View Post
Without meaning to sound too pedantic, the title was a little misleading... Not quite a forced landing!
Forced Landing
An unexpected landing that a pilot of an aircraft has to make because of an emergency situation

Source: Dictionary of Aviation (Second Edition)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 31st January 2009, 10:07 AM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

Thanks Marty - but what he told you and what was reported are vastly different - hence my question .

If the A330 had been more than 5 hours into the (8 hour) flight, it would have been a long way from Darwin and methinks there may have been other alternates available. And the round trip would therefore be nearly 11 hours !

So someone has their facts incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 31st January 2009, 10:44 AM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby C View Post
Thanks Marty - but what he told you and what was reported are vastly different - hence my question .

If the A330 had been more than 5 hours into the (8 hour) flight, it would have been a long way from Darwin and methinks there may have been other alternates available. And the round trip would therefore be nearly 11 hours !

So someone has their facts incorrect.
No worries, just going by what I was told
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 1st February 2009, 05:16 PM
Grahame Hutchison's Avatar
Grahame Hutchison Grahame Hutchison is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney's Eastern Suburbs - View From Bondi To Jibbon Point And Bravo 10 South
Posts: 8,533
Default

Back operating again after the recent problems ....

CS-TMT 5K0005 01/02/2009 15:35 HiFly ADF Charter A330-321

Looks like the return to Sydney from Darwin.

ACARS mode: 2 Aircraft reg: .CS-TMT
Message label: H1 Block id: 4 Msg. no: D39A
Flight id: 5K0005
Message content:-
#DFBD764R01/A33001,1,1
.CS-TMT,09FEB01,02.29.45,YPDN,YSSY,ASY005XXXX,5000,917
002,06.0,000000,SE6N03,VN6003,LXR001,000,052,052
N08.5,35003,0.821,111,0.00,111,10,0,01,111,1.48,X
N08.5,35002,0.822,111
733363
-------------------------------------[01/02/2009 15:35]
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement