Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12th November 2011, 03:22 PM
Kent Broadhead Kent Broadhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dulwich Hill
Posts: 552
Default

LDH is part of NSW, and I can't see a government allowing the air link to be broken in this day and age, whether that meant supporting an operator to take a weight penalty or, if forced to, extending the runway.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 13th November 2011, 03:18 PM
Richard H. Richard H. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian N View Post
What about a Caribou in Rex livery????
Perhaps they should resurvey the lagoon and Jetstar should aquire a couple of Be-200s?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13th November 2011, 04:46 PM
Rob R Rob R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Default

Spot on Richard.
Jetstar=Impulse=Oxley=B200's and PA31's, problem solved.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 13th November 2011, 08:20 PM
Jakef Jakef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 113
Default

Interesting thread.... You don't really think of commercial operations which need some good STOL characteristics... I'm sure some of those Caribou's the RAAF has gotten rid of could be converted and easily handle that runway
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 14th November 2011, 07:01 AM
Richard H. Richard H. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Wink

Actually Rob I was being far less subtle than that.
I was referring to the Beriev-200 Altair jet flying-boat, not the far more sensible King Air...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 14th November 2011, 07:59 AM
Kent Broadhead Kent Broadhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dulwich Hill
Posts: 552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard H. View Post
Perhaps they should resurvey the lagoon and Jetstar should aquire a couple of Be-200s?
That'd be so much fun taking off from Rose Bay - I still have vague memories of the Airlines of NSW Shorts doing the LDH run form Rose Bay.

But I reckon a subsidised DHC? run is a million times more likely....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 14th November 2011, 08:20 PM
Hugh Jarse Hugh Jarse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 217
Default

Why would Eastern cease operations to Lord Howe, especially when it's such a cash cow for them, Rowan?

The youngest of the -200's would have close to 40,000 hours now, with no sign of giving up. I suspect they have a lot of life (and a lot to contribute) to Eastern's bottom line for quite a few years yet.

Hypothetically ridiculous if you ask me
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 14th November 2011, 09:24 PM
Rowan McKeever Rowan McKeever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,653
Default

I agree, the DH8 is going really well and has some nice little niches carved out for itself. Honestly, I doubt QLink would cease LDH and I've never thought that they might. That wasn't really my point.

The reason I put this up was to confirm my understanding (and satisfy my curiosity) that there really IS no alternative to the DH8 given the STOL and range requirements. As I originally said there isn't a lot of stuff on the net about performance for the ATR, etc unlike Boeing/Airbus/Embraer. That's all this was about.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement