|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Would have liked Qantas to have kept an old rego block, such as VH-OG* (767's) or VH-TJ* (734s).
__________________
Next Flight - 19/3 - VA262 - CBR-MEL |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A lot of the TJ regos have gone to other operators unfortunately. For example TJI & TJK are now AW139 helicopters with the ANZ bank. Sad to see unfortunately
__________________
Next Flight - 19/3 - VA262 - CBR-MEL |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The TJ series AW139 were financed by ANZ but operated by Helicorp (Toll), 8 in total looking after the southern region NSW Ambulance contract.
What's interesting is the northern ones also used the ex QF rego as I already mentioned despite being SLSA. Last edited by MarkR; 22nd March 2017 at 08:22 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
What are the chances of QF adding an extra dedicated toilet for Business and an extra 2-3 pitch for Premium Economy? Its clear that many, many people are disappointed with these two aspects of products.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But I hadn't realized PE was so measly on pitch. Some others have up to 40" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
That ratio is better than the a333, and thank goodness 717s dont do long haul with their 1 toilet for 100 odd y seats.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If it doesn't work out in the real world, they can change it.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Could there be an revealing of the next 787 routes this Friday at the investor day?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Unlikely, more interested to see where the A380s will go from QF9, there is nothing currently on application with the IASC re new destinations.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't Qantas point to using them to SIN and HKG?
|
|
|