Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 28th August 2015, 01:22 PM
Greg Hyde Greg Hyde is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,471
Default

I expect that is why the F100 & DC-9 (sorry B717) are still operating.

There is no viable replacement.

A baby Boeing(Max) would suit fleet integration (spares, training etc.) with A319neo would only suit a JQ operation so that a whole new type added to the fleet.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 28th August 2015, 02:30 PM
Christopher Campbell's Avatar
Christopher Campbell Christopher Campbell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 315
Default QF - The Next Generation

If Qantas converted the A380 orders and 4 options to A320neos to expand the overall 99 Qantas Group A320neo options then both the Jetstar and Qantas narrow body aircraft can be A320neos (which would have many benefits). Then this could make sense to order the A319neo for the 717 replacement.

Last edited by Christopher Campbell; 28th August 2015 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 29th August 2015, 10:53 AM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Campbell View Post
Yeah your probably right more like from 2025-2028. Yeah they could activate those last 8 orders plus those 4 options. The A380neo might be out by then. Although I believe Qantas will choose the B7779X/8X for A380 replacement aircraft. All Boeing International (787-9/10 & B777X) fleet must be good for maintence.
Having an all Boeing fleet makes little difference what so ever to maintenance. The 787 and 777 are different aircraft, different parts etc.

When it comes to crewing yes, may make a difference in that the 777 and 787 share a common rating. Though again if you have sufficient enough of each type the difference is minor.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 29th August 2015, 11:05 AM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Campbell View Post
If Qantas converted the A380 orders and 4 options to A320neos to expand the overall 99 Qantas Group A320neo options then both the Jetstar and Qantas narrow body aircraft can be A320neos (which would have many benefits). Then this could make sense to order the A319neo for the 717 replacement.
As has been mentioned before the A319Neo is far too large as a 717 replacement. About 35-50 seats (depending upon configuration) too large.

Some airlines, Air France for example operate A318's to maintain commonality with their other A320 family aircraft, but again as others have pointed out this becomes a costly exercise as they are heavy aircraft flying 'regional' routes.

About the only airline owned A318's that operate effectively are the two BA units that fly LCY-SNN-JFK-LCY in an all business class layout. But of course people are paying a premium, even over LHR-JFK to fly this route. Two reasons, leaving from LCY and outbound it stops in Shannon Ireland to top up the tanks, and clear US Customs and Immigration, meaning on arrival in JFK the flight is a domestic arrival. But clearly the exception rather than rule.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 29th August 2015, 12:07 PM
Christopher Campbell's Avatar
Christopher Campbell Christopher Campbell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 315
Default

What would you think would be the best choice?

Bombardier CS100 or the Embraer E190/195-E2?

Again I believe converting A380 orders and options to A320neos adding to the 99 options to create a 130-140 order to replace JQ 320s and QF 737s
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 29th August 2015, 01:42 PM
Dave Dale Dave Dale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 360
Default

The undelivered A380s might be sold to another carrier even before production since they would have been ordered at at prices much cheaper and probably easier to get rid of this way.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 29th August 2015, 02:26 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Campbell View Post
What would you think would be the best choice?

Bombardier CS100 or the Embraer E190/195-E2?
Who knows. Maybe throw in the CRJ1000 into the mix too. Flew one yesterday actually, not too bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Campbell View Post
Again I believe converting A380 orders and options to A320neos adding to the 99 options to create a 130-140 order to replace JQ 320s and QF 737s
They don't need to convert A380 orders to do that and personally think we will see the A320 in Qantas colours.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 30th August 2015, 04:46 PM
Greg Hyde Greg Hyde is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,471
Default

Last year KLM Cityhopper completed the replacement their F70/100 fleet with E190's.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 30th August 2015, 07:27 PM
MarkR MarkR is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Dale View Post
The undelivered A380s might be sold to another carrier even before production since they would have been ordered at at prices much cheaper and probably easier to get rid of this way.
I am not sure that will happen give there are 150 unfilled orders yet to go into production for the A380, and competition from airlines looking to offload cheaper used aircraft like MAS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement