Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 21st February 2014, 01:17 AM
Ben W Ben W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 141
Default

This is actually really good news. United will go from having the worst product offering across the pacific to now having possibly the best....or at least on a par with the best. The LAX-MEL flight will also bring fares way lower for QA & VA on that route.

Good news all around for the consumer!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 21st February 2014, 06:54 AM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Sydney isn't much better, though of course flying MEL-SYD-SFO on United one wouldn't have to change terminals or go through immigration in Sydney so that is a bonus.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 21st February 2014, 08:38 AM
Ryan K Ryan K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 353
Default

Well, actually they would have to change terminals. UA are cancelling the SYD-MEL-SYD leg of their Australian services when the direct MEL-LAX flights begin.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 21st February 2014, 09:38 AM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Ryan whilst you are correct they are dropping that leg, if you care to follow the conversation back for a few more posts (start reading at post 18) rather than replying to a reply in isolation you would see that somone asked why United doesn't keep SYD-MEL for SFO traffic. The conversation has flowed from there.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 21st February 2014, 11:03 AM
NathanJ NathanJ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Somewhere on earth
Posts: 310
Default

Amazing news. Out with the old, in with the future!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 21st February 2014, 02:44 PM
Daniel M Daniel M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 329
Default

Quite a nice pick across the Pacific for Australians and American's alike - 777, A380 and 787 !
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 24th February 2014, 01:03 PM
Brian Hoy Brian Hoy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 48
Default

[Though LAX is an absolute ****hole to get through. Best to go into the US some other way]

Going though TBIT is a pain but like Delta, United use their own terminal "Terminal seven" for United and should make for a much better transit. I usualy only take about 25 to 30 mins to clear a Delta,s Terminal 5.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 24th February 2014, 09:48 PM
James S. James S. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nope
Posts: 184
Default

Really going to miss their 747's super heavy, smokey departures from Sydney. Spotting here gets even more boring.
__________________
Sigh.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 24th February 2014, 10:29 PM
Brian Wilkes Brian Wilkes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 577
Default

You guys in Sydney dont know how lucky you are with the different variations you get there with the regular services, charters, biz jets and military movements, and you still complain!
__________________
_____________________________________

Regards
Brian Wilkes
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 24th February 2014, 11:17 PM
James S. James S. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nope
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Wilkes View Post
You guys in Sydney dont know how lucky you are with the different variations you get there with the regular services, charters, biz jets and military movements, and you still complain!
I specifically look for more exotic aircraft (Such as the Tu-204 recently which was great) or the classic aircraft. Don't give two hoots about new 787 or A330 service variations. But maybe that appeals to some. With the future loss of the A340-600's of Virgin and Etihad, United's 747's, Qantas having already retired their 767RR's and 734's, Aerolineas Argentinas ceasing services, Korean perhaps not sending their 747-400 after this summer, and Thai perhaps switching to 77W's soon from 744s, to me, that signals a change to more boring aircraft. Sorry, but that's just what I enjoy seeing as a spotter.
__________________
Sigh.

Last edited by James S.; 24th February 2014 at 11:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement