Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 9th June 2009, 11:49 AM
Gareth Forwood Gareth Forwood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 372
Default

Slightly OT, can the 77W fly direct SYD-JNB, or do the ETOPS regulations make it impossible.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 9th June 2009, 12:00 PM
Mick B Mick B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 94
Default

Last I heard they can't...depending how far south you go, you can be up to 4-5hrs from another airport. What sort of ETOPS rules are VA operating the 773 to? Is it 207 mins now?

The only way to get round that would be to fly further north, where you encounter some pretty serious headwinds, with the end result being tight on fuel. Depressurisation planning issues might also come into play.

PER-JNB would make sense, heaps of South Africans there (and we all know how much they like to save a buck!) and offers an alternative to SAA.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 9th June 2009, 03:44 PM
Jim Liu Jim Liu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 38
Default

VA is still selling MEL - LAX nonstop tickets...for now
__________________
airline route news blog
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 9th June 2009, 04:47 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew M View Post
Poor old V can't really do anything right with this launch, and most of it was/is out of their control.

1. Boeing Strike - Delayed Planes
Results in delayed launch & moving customers to other airlines - Frustrates customers

2. Economy Crisis - People just are not travelling

3. Delta's flights

4. Swine Flu - Small impact no doubt

5. Moving customers to/from BNE flights, stuff them around once they will not come back

End result is the canning of the MEL-LAX flights and poor loads on the SYD-LAX flights.
Yeah most of it is out of their control, but sadly this is the risk you take when trying to squeeze into new markets and indeed markets that are already well served by incumbant operators.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 9th June 2009, 05:12 PM
gavin m-cox gavin m-cox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: brighton-le-sands
Posts: 1
Default

well, if v australia was smart...try SYD-CEBU..i fly there 5 times a year,,,,sometimes it takes me 24 hours to get there....syd-hkg-mnl-ceb....qf and pal..allways book out.well most of the time.......
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 9th June 2009, 06:51 PM
Greg McDonald Greg McDonald is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash W View Post
Yeah most of it is out of their control, but sadly this is the risk you take when trying to squeeze into new markets and indeed markets that are already well served by incumbant operators.
Even if the incumbent operators are ripping you off blind...which is why they took the risk
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 9th June 2009, 08:45 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Greg not sure what you mean? Even if Qantas and United are "ripping" us off it doesn't mean that V-Aus coming into the market would be succesful.

PS on the note of ripping us off, yes the prices are high, but in todays business world the value of something is the price the market will pay. So yes on a per KM basis compared to other segments Aus-US flights are high, but using a business sense it could be argued the the price is fair.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 9th June 2009, 09:39 PM
Andre H Andre H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 58
Default

Why they have enough ETOPS Range for the transpacific flights as a new Airline with no experience ?


Greetings from Berlin
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 9th June 2009, 10:11 PM
Gareth Forwood Gareth Forwood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 372
Default

Hi Andre. Forgive me if I've misinterpreted your post - As far as I'm aware, ETOPS is based on the aircraft, not the airline. Based on a 207 min ETOPS, the 77W can easily make it to LAX without any route alteration.



The dark areas indicate regions outside the 207 min limit. This is from the Great Circle Mapper. As always, if I'm wrong, I'm most happy to be corrected.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10th June 2009, 02:09 AM
Nathan Long Nathan Long is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YMML
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gareth Forwood View Post
...ETOPS is based on the aircraft, not the airline. ...
It's both.
__________________
My JetPhotos photos
All Australia Canada NZ UK
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement