Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th November 2011, 11:34 PM
Brad Varney's Avatar
Brad Varney Brad Varney is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: northern beaches of sydney
Posts: 248
Default Airbus stops A340 production.

Sad news, the A340 is one of my favourite airbus aircraft.
Looks like the T7 and A330 have killed it off.
http://www.airlineberg.com/index.php...40-production/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14th November 2011, 12:52 AM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 455
Default

It's a sad news but not unexpected. A340 is my favourite aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14th November 2011, 06:42 AM
John Arena John Arena is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 108
Default

I've been wondering when this announcement would be confirmed, sad day indeed, the A340 is such a pleasure to fly on!

John
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th November 2011, 08:02 AM
Kent Broadhead Kent Broadhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dulwich Hill
Posts: 557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Varney View Post
Looks like the T7 and A330 have killed it off.
And the A380 at the upper end, let alone the A350 to do what the A330 can't with similar capacity. I've always like the A340 bits from Milperra!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th November 2011, 10:33 AM
Steve S... 2 Steve S... 2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 619
Default

That's great news, unattractive aeroplane really!

Love the A330 though...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th November 2011, 10:42 AM
Laurent Sanhard Laurent Sanhard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 158
Default

a beautiful bird that will be sadly missed , ugly - ?? depends on the color scheme ...a great aircraft to fly on , very spacoius and smooth , even though production has ceased , she will be around for many years to come . http://www.airliners.net/photo/Etiha...cb1fd7f6532d2a
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th November 2011, 11:25 AM
Brian Wilkes Brian Wilkes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 578
Default

A very under rated aircraft by all!
__________________
_____________________________________

Regards
Brian Wilkes
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14th November 2011, 01:24 PM
Kent Broadhead Kent Broadhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dulwich Hill
Posts: 557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris d View Post
If it had two engines
Isn't that an A330?

Sort of sad to see it go (A345 was very nice), but better to ramp up the A350 program and A320 neo.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14th November 2011, 01:43 PM
Kent Broadhead Kent Broadhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dulwich Hill
Posts: 557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris d View Post
Well, no, it isn't. I don't see any A330-600X aircraft in operation, or built for that matter. Nor A330-500.
I don't disagree with you about the larger frames (and I'd selectively quoted you, so can't complain about your edit ). I'd always worked the basis that the 500 and 600 were stepping stones for the 380 engines?

But perhaps the decision to go long with the A340 rather than the A330 predated the 777LR program? Anyway, A330s going well, A380s going reasonably, A320 going gangbusters and A350 soon to come. Same old A vs B leapfrogging I suppose....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15th November 2011, 07:51 PM
Ellis Taylor Ellis Taylor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 47
Default

The A340, at least in its first guise, would never have had a long life. The first time I travelled on one was with SriLankan Airlines, and I was puzzled why you would use four Boeing 737 issues (CFM56s on that one) on an aircraft designed to fly long-haul. Sure, the -600 and -500 were major improvements, but at the end of the day fuel prices made them uneconomic against the 777s. With extended twin ops now the standard in most of the world (SYD-EZE and SYD-JNB excepted), Airbus's bet on the '4 engines for longhaul' mantra ultimately lost out
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement