#1
|
||||
|
||||
Cardiologist's polite letter of concern to Rex...
I wonder if Rex's corporate services general manager Irwin Tan will be looking for a new job...
Quote:
Last edited by Bernie P; 1st August 2012 at 09:59 AM. Reason: source |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I wouldn't mind seeing all of the correspondence that was sent between the two parties. Whilst on the outside it appears to have been very poorly handled by Rex, the story is very one-sided.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have to agree with Nigel. Whilst it appears a certain way,we all need to remember that there are always two sides to every story. I would not pass judgement without hearing both sides.
Jim
__________________
787/A350.......the next generation |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks David. I'll have a look when I get to work.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Likewise David,will have a look as soon as I can.
Thanks for posting. Jim
__________________
787/A350.......the next generation |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
who ever wrote the Rex letter should be looking for a new career ASAP, PR is not his forte
(you just don't write letters like that in the corporate world, even if that is your feelings)
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired Last edited by Andrew P; 1st August 2012 at 05:48 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Absolutely DISGUSTING!!!!!
The treatment of this passenger is nothing short of rubbish. I have never been a fan of REX, and this just goes to show what I always had the opinion of - second rate, rude and power driven (I should clarify, this is management I'm talking about. The people on the front line are excellent). Mick |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
After reading the letter (in full of both), I am of the conclusion that a) the Cardiologist is a bafoon, and b) Irwin (if acting like he's stated) is equally as big a bafoon!
In response to the Dr's. correspondence, he (Irwin) should have directed him to the 'Conditions of carriage' that he mentioned in point 3 of the companies reply, thank him for his letter, and outline what the causes of his delay were. Really, nothing further was needed! And, I find it farcical that any companies CEO would instruct a reply of this type knowing that it would only become a PR nightmare, if as in this case, it got out to the media! The Dr. doesn't go without a comment either, but 'assuming' he's out at Griffith on the Governments time, then any associated costs would be worn by the NSW tax payers... AND, assuming, lets say, he's out there on a pro-bono basis, then why is he claiming cost's? I can only imagine that he is trying to milk it out of REX! And finally, I think, after flying with them, they are a wonderful regional airline, and I have the privileged of knowing both current and past crew, and they are certainly NOT of the standard of what this letter depicts. They are both professional in nature and excellent representatives of the company! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I don't consider the Dr a bafoon , quite the opposite actually , although I do think that Irwin fits that description . Bernie , what would your response had been if you were in the Drs shoes? . It doesn't matter if the affected passengers were Drs , plumbers or whatever, Irwins response was completely uncalled for and unprofessional in the extreme. To make reference to the Drs professional position was childish and immature , and deserves all the criticism it gets . I do agree , however , that the hardworking crew should not be regarded as representative of the inept management.
Dave C |
|
|