Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th November 2008, 05:05 PM
Saj_A Saj_A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 82
Default 787 Faces New Setback

Story at ATW here.

Seems that Airplane Numer 1 is proving to be most troublesome!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th November 2008, 07:46 PM
Andrew P's Avatar
Andrew P Andrew P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: near the old NDB at West Pymble and near RPLR
Posts: 749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saj_A View Post
Story at ATW Airplane Numer 1[/URL] is proving to be most troublesome!
typical, I remember my 1st wife as the most troublesome of the wives I've had!!!

Banjo
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th November 2008, 07:51 PM
Bernie P's Avatar
Bernie P Bernie P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew P View Post
typical, I remember my 1st wife as the most troublesome of the wives I've had!!!

Banjo
Still is for me!!!
__________________
----------

My Flight Diary

My Photos Flickr Images
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th November 2008, 08:48 PM
Saj_A Saj_A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew P View Post
typical, I remember my 1st wife as the most troublesome of the wives I've had!!!

Banjo
I do hope that your subsequent wife /(wives) ahve proven less problematic!

On a serious note, this whole episode on the 787-8 proves Boeing will have really no choice but to go back to its older model of producing/manufacturing/assembling itself.

If you ask me, the biggest mistake was adding Vought into the 787 chain.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4th November 2008, 09:02 PM
Ryan Hothersall's Avatar
Ryan Hothersall Ryan Hothersall is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 338
Default 787

I am starting to think the 767 should called the Lemonliner instead of Dreamliner.

At one time Boeing were making jokes etc at Airbus with the delays with the A380, that backfired on Boeing as the A380 is in service and their 787 hasn't even flown yet.
__________________
Next Trip

My Stuff on the web
http://www.ryanhothersall.net/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 4th November 2008, 09:48 PM
Saj_A Saj_A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan Hothersall View Post
At one time Boeing were making jokes etc at Airbus with the delays with the A380...
I think you're mistaken there - Boeing "fans" may have, but certainly not the company and I'd be grateful if you could show an example of the company mocking Airbus.

A quick glance at Boeing's site tells you quite a different view:

If anything, its in stark contrast to your claim...

http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archive...rolls_out.html

http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archive..._delivery.html

http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archive..._in_paris.html

Quote:
Airbus tried stirring things up a bit today. Their CEO Noel Forgeard held a news conference here and proceeded to criticize, it seemed, all things Boeing. Everything from our strategy and our 787 Dreamliner, to the way Boeing does public relations. At the same time, he tried offering us advice about our business practices!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th November 2008, 03:48 AM
Saj_A Saj_A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 82
Default

Just to add, Boeing have given me an update which I have added to my article in the first post outlining briefly the issues on the fasteners.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th November 2008, 07:10 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan Hothersall View Post
I am starting to think the 767 should called the Lemonliner instead of Dreamliner.

At one time Boeing were making jokes etc at Airbus with the delays with the A380, that backfired on Boeing as the A380 is in service and their 787 hasn't even flown yet.

Not to defend either manufacturer but to be fair, the 380 has been on the go a lot longer than the 787 . With 903 on order (before it has even flown)and the radical change to construction methods, in time I believe the 787 will be a far more influential aircraft to the industry than merely being big.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 5th November 2008, 07:28 AM
Shameel Kumar Shameel Kumar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Now in Central California
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saj_A View Post
If you ask me, the biggest mistake was adding Vought into the 787 chain.

Another problem was letting Alan Mullaly go.

From the few books I've read the number documentaries of watched, he was a great part of pushing Boeing forward when it came to the 777 program, and he would have been a great asset to retain in this time of disarray with the 787.

Fascinating though.. the A380 delayed, the 787 delayed, and now a sizeable delay in the A350 as well. Thank goodness engineers produce aircraft, not the marketing guys (this coming from a guy who studied Marketing at uni ).
__________________
-
Trip Report: SYD-LAX-SFO (QF A380 & VX A320) - Jan. '09
Check out my Flickr: Shameel Kumar - Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 5th November 2008, 07:56 AM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Sad news
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement