|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
747-200 landing at Longreach
I've been looking everywhere for the video of when she landed (to try to win a bet about how many engines were running when she landed). I swear that I saw this somewhere a couple of years ago but can't find it now? Can anyone help?
Thanks, Ben Last edited by Ben W; 27th May 2008 at 11:00 AM. Reason: notification setting |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceCt2_hPoGY
That's the only Youtube video I can find. However to answer the question at hand, the 2 outboard engines were shut down for the landing to reduce the chance of FOD ingestion. Mick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I thought that the 2 outboard engines were on idle and didn't use reverse thrust only the 2 inboard ones had the T/R's deployed.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Even thou its just a hunk of metal its hard not to get a little teary eyed watching that.VH-EBQ is dead. long live the 747-800.Still the elegant lady of the skies.Something airbus could never match,building an aircraft that looks good.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
B737 Vs. A320 = A320 much nice looking, to me nose and tail seem nicer, 737 to me look a bit outdated, mind you I like the 737's Winglets....
__________________
..... up up and away with TAA |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I understand (from what the guides were saying at Longreach) that records have been kept so that everything that needs to be done to get it back in the air can be done. Highly unlikely I know, but not dead... just dormant.
__________________
Things ain't what they used to be! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
She'll never leave Longreach. Never.
Only way it can possibly leave Longreach is if they were to extend the runway to enable it. Mick |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the link. I was always under the impression that she landed with 1&4 on idle as well, but my friend insists they were all turning at the same speed? The video doesn't really prove either of us wrong so I guess we'll continue to argue about it for now! lol
Cheers, Ben |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
All engines are at idle at touchdown anyway, so I dont see what difference it would have made doing the approach without 1&4?
I also suspect that doing an intentional 2 engined approach would be operating outside the flight manual ceritification. If you prang an aeroplane while intentionally operating outside the 'envelope' then you would have some fantastic lawsuits coming your way. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Are you the Ben W I think you are??? Scott.
__________________
http://flickr.com/photos/bfiguy/ |
|
|