![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does this new charge apply to tickets already booked and paid for ?
As for estimating the weight of luggage at home, I don't have any scales and would just be guessing. The new charge may not increase the "fare" but certainly increases the cost of "flying" and there's no way Virgin can deny that. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
There is a new GO Fare which is down around $20 on the previous Blue Saver fare. So your actually winner if all you pay is $8. Even you travel without bags, even better. Also, the limit is now 23kg, not the previous 20kg. All these measures were announced on 18 July to the ASX, so nothing new. The extra security measures for baggage, now means that a bag costs more than a person to get from a to b. P.S. Bob, in brighter news for you, you might see a few ZP* rego’s your way soon ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
and why are they bringing in this charge? is it due to oil costs because oil has fallen considerably in the last 3 weeks.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oil costs, it is old news it was announced 3-4 weeks ago.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No it is all about hiding the real costs of flying. Over here in Europe all the LLC's do it. It makes the fares look cheaper than what they really are. It gets under my skin as I reckon the fare should be the fare, factoring everything in all at once. The fuel surcharges, baggage charges etc should just be included in one price called "the fare"
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of years ago, airlines were told they had to show their fares as the fare + any other costs/taxes that went along with it. Rather than advertising the fare, then the poor punter finding they've also picked up about $40 worth of extra charges/fee's. I remember that was an ACCC ruling.
Why, all of a sudden, can Virgin find a way around this? Double standards? Mick |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Radi - I hope to get in a few days spotting in Sydney and other real airports as Perth can be a bit quiet at times.
|
![]() |
|
|