#11
|
||||
|
||||
Please refrain from quoting the whole post above in your post - mod
It's way above my pay grade to know whether seven is enough, although I doubt we could ever crew or field ~12 Chinooks at a time! The Chinook has grown into a fairly specialist 'hot & high' heavylift and Special Forces support role in Afghanistan, and with the arrival of 40+ MRH 90s in the near future, they'll pick up alot of the the medium lift work previously done by Chinooks but which was beyond the capabilities of the Huey and Black Hawk. Yes, the Ds have been flogged, but they have all recently received new engines and two of them are only a decade old, and there is now a pretty good rest and reconstitute cycle in place which seems to be spreading the load much better betwen airframes. Whether we need more than two Chooks in Afghanistan at once is also debatable - my gut feeling is our RTF and Special Forces may be better served with a few Tigers or Black Hawks instead. There is also a fourth Herc headed over there to support the latest troop increase as well. Cheers
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
The Defence White Paper looks a little boring with nothing here really that would be considered Earth shattering for ADF aviation. We were already well down the track of KC-30A, MRH90 (for Army and Navy), Wedgetail, Caribous were always going to be replaced (and 10 replacements has been mentioned a few times already, that's why we have an Interim Replacement Program underway) and F Model Chooks was well known. Although the replacement of the S-70B-2s with 24 replacements was a bit surprising as was the two extra J models and retirement of the H models (though that was always going to happen).
I wonder what the White Paper looked like before Treasury got to it. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Damien, i was just presuming they were waiting to be painted into the new scheme all this time. Do we know whats going to happen to them now, or are they just going to be moved to where the 707s are parked too...if there is enough room?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I have no idea on what the RAAF intends to do with them. It would be good to see at least one head down to the RAAF Museum.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
From what i gathered this is their method of closing the gap between the retirement of the Bou until the acquisition of the new C-27J's. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Out of interest i just received Australian Aviation magazine in the mail, an interesting article about the white paper in there too.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Andrew, please refrain from quoting the whole previous post in your post, it is not necessary, thank you - mod
The White Paper was a bit of a non-event from an aviation point of view - nothing really new in there. We initially reported on the King Airs late last year - it seems like a good move getting out of the 'steam gauge' Caribou into an interim turbine powered, EFIS equipped leased King Air before the C-27J/C-295M arrives from about 2014.
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
For anyone interested here is a picture of King Air A32-651 on the producion line for the RAAF. Due to be delivered 2010. Images from Australian defence force.
|
|
|