Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 25th January 2011, 12:48 PM
Jack B Jack B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 422
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan K View Post
I can't beleive Qantas are still flying aircraft nearly 21 years of age....
Until recently Delta/Northwest were flying DC-9's from the late 60s very efficiently.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25th January 2011, 12:49 PM
Sarah C Sarah C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wishing I was under a flightpath
Posts: 1,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan K View Post
I can't beleive Qantas are still flying aircraft nearly 21 years of age....
The oldest 767 flying with QF was delivered in 1988, same the 747's. Age is not an issue if they are well maintained.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 25th January 2011, 01:10 PM
Robert S Robert S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah C View Post
...if they are well maintained.
Which is of course the flavour of the month in reporting... and before we all beat up the media again, they are right to be asking the questions (it's only when they make up hysterical answers to these questions that they are in the wrong).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 25th January 2011, 02:04 PM
Dave Dale Dave Dale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah C View Post
The oldest 767 flying with QF was delivered in 1988, same the 747's. Age is not an issue if they are well maintained.
As much as I love Qantas and I do, what the average passenger see most of the time when they board a Qantas 767, 747 or 737 (except those on the Tasman) is a dated aircraft with dated interiors and to some extent, probably a sense of nostalgia. I have often wondered how long can Qantas go without taking some measures to get new aircraft in the fleet faster. I know they have the 787's on order and that's great, but if the first delivery for the 787 in Qantas colours is still some three to four years away, surely Qantas management know that these dated aircraft will drive customers somewhere else. I believe that for the general public, most fly on aesthetics, the feel and look of the aircraft and its interiors. The poor old 737-400's, they have served us well and will continue to do so until they are replaced. But in the meantime, their ages get greater and their product becomes more dated.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 25th January 2011, 02:58 PM
Geoff W Geoff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 178
Default

A real scare story! Right!!!

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vic...-1225994110664

Not the REAL reason I posted it.

I agree with Dave and Sarah.

It is probably more of a concern of what is this doing to the QF brand?

This I assume will be on all the tv news sites tonight and papers tomorrow.

I not for one minute believe it would be a pleasant experience, I also dont believe that these events wont happen at times.

QF have had more than their share of bad luck in recent times, it is becoming a real negative. Which is very unfortunate and damaging to the business.

I have had several people (just a few) mention to me they wouldnt fly QF cause of what they have heard in recent times.

I think that is stupid.

However, just in my small world, it's a few lost international pax.

Kind regards,

Geoff

Last edited by Geoff W; 25th January 2011 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Still cant spell.. Doh!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 25th January 2011, 05:33 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Dale View Post
As much as I love Qantas and I do, what the average passenger see most of the time when they board a Qantas 767, 747 or 737 (except those on the Tasman) is a dated aircraft with dated interiors and to some extent, probably a sense of nostalgia. I have often wondered how long can Qantas go without taking some measures to get new aircraft in the fleet faster. I know they have the 787's on order and that's great, but if the first delivery for the 787 in Qantas colours is still some three to four years away, surely Qantas management know that these dated aircraft will drive customers somewhere else. I believe that for the general public, most fly on aesthetics, the feel and look of the aircraft and its interiors. The poor old 737-400's, they have served us well and will continue to do so until they are replaced. But in the meantime, their ages get greater and their product becomes more dated.

Dave
What do you want Qantas management to do? They had a plan to replace the older 747's, it's called the A380, the first of which was delivered 2-3 years behind schedule so of course there are going to be 747's that they have kept longer than they wanted to. Yes their interiors are dated a little, but through cabin upgrades etc they are almost as good as any new aircraft out there in terms of passenger comfort, amenity and of course safety.

They have a plan to replace the 767's. These are things called A330's, which have been progressively introduced over the past few years, on time and of course we have the 787's which by the time they make it to the fleet will be delayed by a good few years. Again what can Qantas do to help counter the delay of the 787? Do they go an lease in some aircraft on a temporary basis? If so where do they go? What age aircraft do you think they would get on short term lease?

They have plans to replace the 737-400's, these things called 737-800's have been coming in regularly since 2002. Not sure what you mean that the 737's except on the Tasman look dated, I for one certainly don't think the 30+ 737-800's flying domestically looked all that dated.

Now sure there are some old aircraft in the fleet, but by the same token there are HEAPS of new aircraft too. By my calculation about half the fleet is under 8 years old with a plan to introduce many new aircraft over the next 5 years or so.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 25th January 2011, 05:33 PM
AdamC AdamC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South coast NSW
Posts: 144
Default

Does anyone know of any other incidents in the world today involving aircraft or was QANTAS the only one that had an aircraft have a problem occur to it. What a load of crap, if people don't let the media know about these things it would never get printed.

God i love the media.

My two cents worth.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 25th January 2011, 05:39 PM
Shayne G Shayne G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 6 mins flying time out of 34L
Posts: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan K View Post
I can't beleive Qantas are still flying aircraft nearly 21 years of age....
Qantas generally retires their aircraft when they reach 23 years old or around there. So expect this aircraft to withdrawn from use in the next 2 or 3 years.


When I heard about this incident I thought it was that Perth Incident being reported again for some strange reason. I can't help but wonder how the media is going to spin this story.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 25th January 2011, 05:42 PM
Jack B Jack B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 422
Default

VH-OGG a few weeks back didn't look at all that bad on the inside! Quite refreshed actually.

The younger VH-OGR looked quite dated with the old blue bulkheads and Dreamtime seats, however the economy cabin had the honeycomb seat fabrics. I didn't know any of the Dreamtime 767s got the honeycomb seats until I walked down the aisle! Maybe it's just -OGR?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 25th January 2011, 05:54 PM
Mark B Mark B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamC View Post
Does anyone know of any other incidents in the world today involving aircraft or was QANTAS the only one that had an aircraft have a problem occur to it. What a load of crap, if people don't let the media know about these things it would never get printed.
The Aviation Herald (http://www.avherald.com/) is an eye opener with regard to incidents (and I'd say there are plenty that don't make it there either)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement