#11
|
||||
|
||||
Nice photos, I like that A330, so sharp, very nice. But yeah out of my reach. I have the 70-200 2.8 IS.
Its a bit deceiving but those 380s look like they were on 34R (they weren't were they).
__________________
MY PHOTOS http://myaviation.net/?uid=23990 ( updated 05-11-08 ) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew, they are impressive .... what was the full kit used to take these?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Some of the captions say a 50D body Lee.
I know a few people who use the 300 prime for wildlife photography, and the results are simply stunning even with 1.4X and 2X converters.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Lee - Yep, 50D body, and 300mm f2.8. For the A330 I also used the 1.4xTC, but took it off afterwards!
Tony - definately 34L! |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I ended up getting the 24-105 for a good price on Ebay ( the seller had 0 feedback so I'll be sweating on it for a few days). I was driven towards the 24-70 for low light, but i think the advantages of the 24-105 in most situations as an everyday lens will suit me.
The money that I have saved, I will use to buy a prime lens, such as the Canon 50mm f1/1.4 for low light shots. Thanks again for the feedback.
__________________
MY PHOTOS http://myaviation.net/?uid=23990 ( updated 05-11-08 ) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Was going to mention that I bought my son the 18-200 f4.5-5.6 IS and it's a ripper for almost all scenarios. Only criticism is slight vignetting at the edges at 200mm.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
MY PHOTOS http://myaviation.net/?uid=23990 ( updated 05-11-08 ) |
|
|