Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #161  
Old 14th March 2014, 11:58 AM
Rich W Rich W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Lumsden View Post
This information has since been debunked...
I thought that too however apparently... "The engines of a missing Malaysian airliner continued to operate for about four hours after it disappeared from radar over the Gulf of Thailand, US authorities said on Thursday"

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-...#ixzz2vtkaOuLZ
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 14th March 2014, 12:18 PM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 455
Default

Either the Malaysian Government knows a lot more than what they have publicly stated, or they don't have the faintest idea of what has happened to the plane.
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 14th March 2014, 01:35 PM
Hugh Jarse Hugh Jarse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich W View Post
Does anyone know the technology how this engine data is transmitted? How could they receive this info up to 4 hours after the last ACARS message? Why wouldn't Malaysian Airlines have this info too? In the press conference they mentioned that no other data was received after the last ACARS message. Smells like media hype to me.

Generally, via standard VHF link. If it is unable to connect that way, then it uses satphone.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 14th March 2014, 02:30 PM
Rich W Rich W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 67
Default

I know its too early yet but in the future, don't you think it would make more sense that the transponder is securely located so it is not allowed to be turned off by anyone on board? Obviously this won't help if there is some kind of malfunction however at least in MH370 case, would have ruled out the possibility of foul play.
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 14th March 2014, 02:58 PM
NathanJ NathanJ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Somewhere on earth
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich W View Post
I thought that too however apparently... "The engines of a missing Malaysian airliner continued to operate for about four hours after it disappeared from radar over the Gulf of Thailand, US authorities said on Thursday"

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-...#ixzz2vtkaOuLZ
Don't believe everything you read on the internet!

SMH article from this morning states that those claims reported in the wall street journal were "unverified".

http://www.smh.com.au/world/malaysia...313-hvifu.html

Then this article states that "Sources familiar with the investigation reiterated that neither Boeing nor Rolls-Royce had received any engine maintenance data from the jet after the point at which its pilots last made contact. Only one engine maintenance update was received during the normal phase of flight, they said, speaking on condition on anonymity"

http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-...#ixzz2vtkaOuLZ

So much "story" telling!!!
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 14th March 2014, 03:07 PM
Todd Hendry Todd Hendry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kirrawee
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich W View Post
I know its too early yet but in the future, don't you think it would make more sense that the transponder is securely located so it is not allowed to be turned off by anyone on board? Obviously this won't help if there is some kind of malfunction however at least in MH370 case, would have ruled out the possibility of foul play.
No Rich.

If it caught on fire I'd rather be able to cut power to it than worry about something so remote as this happening.

A transponder is only as good as the ground equipment it talks or doesn't talk to.

Todd.
__________________
“When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it.”

Henry Ford.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 14th March 2014, 03:34 PM
NathanJ NathanJ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Somewhere on earth
Posts: 310
Default

Interesting new article from one of the USA's most credible reporting agencies...

http://www.theonion.com/articles/mal...5524/?ref=auto
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 14th March 2014, 05:16 PM
Montague S's Avatar
Montague S Montague S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Mak View Post
Either the Malaysian Government knows a lot more than what they have publicly stated, or they don't have the faintest idea of what has happened to the plane.
once again the latter would be correct..and that's partly due to 50 years of 1 government rule.
__________________
photos updated 29 Sept

Next Flights:
MEL-HKG-HND-HKG-JFK-HKG-NRT-HKG-MEL/CX
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 14th March 2014, 08:32 PM
Olle Q Olle Q is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 40
Default

Reauters are supposed to be a reliable source, but in this case I don´t know. Read this:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...A2D0DG20140314
__________________
Olle
Sweden
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 14th March 2014, 08:32 PM
Paul F Paul F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 103
Default

New radar evidence shows flight MH370 following waypoints towards the Andaman Islands.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement