Rego requests

[Nigel C]

That was part of the idea of starting this thread; generate some new ideas as well as putting forward my own proposal.

[Nigel C]

Hey Mods,

Any update on whether rego requests can have their own sub-forum? I see they've become flavour of the month again.

Cheers

[Brian Wilkes]

Agree its becoming ridicules at times!

[Raymond Rowe]

It gets very annoying at times.

[Kurt A]

The Admin Team has discussed that there really isn't a need to create a whole new Sub Division of the Forum simply for Aircraft Registration Requests at this stage.

What we suggest in the interim, is that for every new thread that is created requiring a registration for an aircraft, is that the poster clearly labels the new thread as "Rego Request" !

This will then keep the thread clearly identified as an Aircraft Registration Request thread, whereby giving those users who choose not read those particular threads, plenty of warning that it is actually a rego request thread; thus alleviating those users of the stress and pain of actually opening and reading it

The Admin Team will do their best to keep an eye on those threads that appear as Rego Requests threads, whereby the title is a clear mis-match, and contrary to the request above.

At this stage there will be no required amendment to the Conditions of Use.

Thank you.


Please keep in mind that the 'Spotting and Movements' forum relates to any noteworthy or interesting civil and military movements (fixed and rotary wing), rumours, traffic, ad-hoc schedule variations, registrations, viewing locations, airshows and events, airport tours, comments, queries (Australian and international).