Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Spotting and Movements > Spotting and Movements
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 27th March 2008, 10:45 AM
Scott Lindsell Scott Lindsell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash W View Post
So the OP was half right then?

Yes sorry if there was any confusion there chaps . Torins link will tell you all about the E-10 and he was also right in correcting that Japan and Italy also have taken delivery of some of their 762 tankers. Japan currently has a yellow primer 762 tanker frame up at PAE which should fly in the next week or so.
I can post a photo of one of Italy's tankers if required/wanted ???
Scott.

Hey Mori, soggy but good. Snow today and we're in spring !!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27th March 2008, 01:37 PM
Shameel Kumar Shameel Kumar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Now in Central California
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torin Wilson View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-10_MC2A

E-10 isn't the tanker.

KC-767 (762ER) lost to KC-45 (A332) for the USAF aerial refueling competition thingy
Firstly, wasn't the latest KC-767 tanker based on the 767-200LRF platform, not the -200ER?
The tankers which Italy and Japan have placed orders for are straight-up conversions of 767-200ER aircraft.

The E-10 which Scott took a couple of photos of is based off the 767-400ER platform and it seems as though it is/was a replacement for the Boeing 707-based E-3 Sentry AWACS, the E-8 Joint STARS aircraft, and EC-135 ELINT aircraft.

So from that the question I have for Scott is... why do you suggest that the E-10 will soon be collecting dust out in the desert? Did the development ..and ultimately the production of the E-10 depend on the new KC-767 Advanced Tanker winning the USAF aerial refueling bid? .... couldn't it still be built regardless of the KC-767's fate?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27th March 2008, 03:31 PM
Torin Wilson Torin Wilson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shameel Kumar View Post
Firstly, wasn't the latest KC-767 tanker based on the 767-200LRF platform, not the -200ER?
The tankers which Italy and Japan have placed orders for are straight-up conversions of 767-200ER aircraft.

The E-10 which Scott took a couple of photos of is based off the 767-400ER platform and it seems as though it is/was a replacement for the Boeing 707-based E-3 Sentry AWACS, the E-8 Joint STARS aircraft, and EC-135 ELINT aircraft.

So from that the question I have for Scott is... why do you suggest that the E-10 will soon be collecting dust out in the desert? Did the development ..and ultimately the production of the E-10 depend on the new KC-767 Advanced Tanker winning the USAF aerial refueling bid? .... couldn't it still be built regardless of the KC-767's fate?
You're right about the 200ER/LRF thing. But if you read the link I posted it explains exactly what you are asking.

The E10A funding was dropped at the end of FY07.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27th March 2008, 08:27 PM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

E-10 is designed to replace the E-8C Joint STARS 707s, although funding has been slowed to a trickle in recent years.

A big canoe fairing will be added under the forward fuselage to carry a big SAR radar antenna.
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28th March 2008, 08:47 AM
Scott Lindsell Scott Lindsell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 193
Default

Next Japanese tanker first flight was today.
S.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement