|
|
|
#23
18th February 2009, 08:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Nick,
The over use of Noise reduction tools is generally frowned upon at JP, basically because it starts to introduce artifacts and fringing. I think in your case what has saved you is that that the shot is a night shot and the artifacts are not as easily seen. At the time of screening there was some discussion around the noise reduction in the picture amongst the screeners. Monty is sort of correct. Although maybe it would have gone for overprocessing more than manipulation, in that the use of noise reduction and the sharpening has had an affect on the picture. Manipulation is more for when somebody deliberately alters a picture in some way to get it in the database (and believe me you should see some of the beautys we get). But that's all irrelevant. It's been accepted, it's been viewed a few thousand times and it stays in the Database. The plan now is to learn and keep improving your photography skills and get even better pics in the database. The forums at JP are there to help photographers,so if you have any questions post them there, there are always JP crew and experienced people around to help.
__________________
My Jetphotos Click Clicks Whens the BBQ in Brisvegas Muzzdog?? Soon.. No where. Where should I go? 
|
|
#27
19th February 2009, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
don't want to plug but one of mine made top 2 for a day, with no particular reason (totally unexpected) e.g. since it wasn't really anything special.. was dissappointed this didn't happen to my 743 photo
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6469648
|
|
#30
21st February 2009, 12:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great shot Nick
The fake windows really stand out at night. Darren 
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
