Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 20th November 2008, 10:00 PM
Mark Grima Mark Grima is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 495
Default

OJM? Wasn't that the bird involved in the incident into BKK earlier this year where it lost all power? Dodgy drip tray was the cause?

Bad luck for both birds...I'd be getting ride of them both!

Cheers

M
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 21st November 2008, 06:15 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty H View Post
Looks like OJK was the 'innocent' one this time around. As I said in a previous post, surprised they didnt have a marshaller or ground engineer keeping an eye on the tow when they knew it was within close proximity to another aircraft.

I thought the same (OJK innocent) when I saw the TV report. It appeared to be parked with it's tail at the end of the tramac with OJM being towed past... well almost past
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 21st November 2008, 07:03 AM
Matt_L Matt_L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Grima View Post
OJM? Wasn't that the bird involved in the incident into BKK earlier this year where it lost all power? Dodgy drip tray was the cause?

Bad luck for both birds...I'd be getting ride of them both!

Cheers

M
Mark,
I believe OJM "City of Gosford" was also involved in an engine surge incident back in early 2007 after which it returned to Sydney about 20 minutes after takeoff to LAX. Remember the forum members interviewed on that incident- classic- Beau Chenery it was if i remember correctly.

Bad luck indeed for these two.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 21st November 2008, 07:13 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Question What the ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike W View Post
I thought the same (OJK innocent) when I saw the TV report. It appeared to be parked with it's tail at the end of the tramac with OJM being towed past... well almost past
Well, not even "almost" - the leading edge of OJM's wing hit OJK's radome pretty squarely. In my opinion, just based on the few pics that have been published, this is more than a slight misjudgement. What track could the tug have followed in relation to OJK to have achieved this outcome, even if it had started a sharp right turn?
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 21st November 2008, 07:20 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Argy View Post
Well, not even "almost" - the leading edge of OJM's wing hit OJK's radome pretty squarely. In my opinion, just based on the few pics that have been published, this is more than a slight misjudgement. What track could the tug have followed in relation to OJK to have achieved this outcome, even if it had started a sharp right turn?
Let's wait for the investigation to run its course, and then all will be revealed.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 21st November 2008, 07:46 AM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Argy View Post
Well, not even "almost" - the leading edge of OJM's wing hit OJK's radome pretty squarely. In my opinion, just based on the few pics that have been published, this is more than a slight misjudgement. What track could the tug have followed in relation to OJK to have achieved this outcome, even if it had started a sharp right turn?
A couple of different senarios OJK wasnt parked on its correct line and was too close to the taxiway, or OJM wasnt being towed down the centreline of the taxiway.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 21st November 2008, 03:09 PM
Jack B Jack B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 422
Default

So it was -OJM in that engine surge incident, I thought it was an ER

I remember that on the news, an American woman crying saying she feared for her life...as always
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 21st November 2008, 03:37 PM
Matt_L Matt_L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Hi Jack,

Here is link. Was definitely OJM.

http://atsb.gov.au/publications/inve...200700356.aspx
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 21st November 2008, 08:00 PM
Mark Grima Mark Grima is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 495
Default

This is the incident I was thinking of. Poor OJM has not had a good 20 months

http://atsb.gov.au/publications/inve...200800003.aspx

Cheers

M
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 22nd November 2008, 09:18 AM
Jack B Jack B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 422
Default

bye bye OJH, OJK and OJM perhaps?

Some of Qantas 744's are getting very old. I know it's all related to A380 delays but Qantas really should of ordered 777's
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement