#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
YSSY Forum Administrator |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I think that's a typo, should be A330s since Air AsiaX has not order A350s, only 10 additional A330s a few weeks ago. Should be an interesting race to see who gets their A330s first... Air AsiaX who have ordered straight from Airbus, or Jetstar who are desperate to find A330s to lease. If JQ did want to fly to London, where exactly would they intend to stop-over? If Air Asia X will be able to fly from Asia to London, then why wouldn't JQ be able to fly to London via an Asian hub? Even with 787s they wouldn't be able to do direct to London.. so what's the big fuss about only being able to fly to Athens or Rome? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Boeing Moves 787 Dreamliner to structural test rig
Quote:
__________________
YSSY Forum Administrator |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I was watching a documentary on Discovery Channel today called Decoding Distaster - Planes.
It was basically about composite materials and how they go in an airplane. They referred to a few accidents with A300/A310's with composite materials that failed during flight. It did get me thinking how structurally sound the 787 would be. After having watched it, from what i can tell, one needs pretty decent ultrasound equipment to tell if the fuselage is damaged or not (even under a microscope, things dont show up). It also said that the FAA (when they made the doco) had left it upto individual airlines to purchase/use such equipment. After seeing it, it doesn't leave me with a lot of hope that the 787 will be a strucutrally sound airliner. All these little things that could go wrong with the fuselage make me uneasy. While I am sure Boeing would NEVER build a strucutrally un-sound airliner, I am of the belief that not all airlines will use the best maintenance procedures, and i doubt many will considering ultrasound equipment is likely required to see small stress fractures.(seriously, how much would it cost, and how long would it take to examine a whole plane!). On the doco, they hit a piece of Carbon Fibre with a hammer, and ultrasounded it, to come up with TINY bits of damaged areas. I don't know...perhaps others thoughts on this? Perhaps im a crazy old cook (at the ripe old age of 17), nevertheless, its slightly concerning. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I have the same reservations myself, but I do trust that Boeing, the airlines and the regulators will address all issues, including maintenance to ensure it is as safe as any conventional airframe.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
B787 - possible two year delay
Hey you guys, found this on www.flightglobal.com
Boeing 787 customers are being advised that they face delays of at least two years to their first deliveries following the latest programme slip, and are preparing to seek compensation. Industry sources say that the average delay to first delivery is around 27 months. Air Canada, which has 37 787s on order, says it has been informed by Boeing that its first delivery will be pushed back by 24-30 months to around January 2012. The airline's chief executive Montie Brewer says the carrier "will run into [capacity] issues in 2010 when the first aircraft was supposed to show up. Sources say that Qatar Airways is facing a similar length of delay to Air Canada, of over two years. The airline has 30 firm orders and 30 options, the first of which had been due in August 2010. Qatar Airways chief executive Akbar Al Baker says the airline will exercise existing 777 options to bridge the 787 delay and is considering additional leases. Air Canada and Qatar Airways confirm they will seek compensation from Boeing. LAN Airlines, which has 32 787s on order, has warned that it is facing a delay of around two years, while Royal Jordanian expects to wait up to 30 months to the delivery of its first of 11 aircraft on order. The delay for North American launch customer Northwest Airlines, which has 18 787s on order, is not as significant. The carrier expects its first delivery to slip from the original August 2008 target to the fourth quarter of 2009. The 787 had been due to enter service this month with launch customer All Nippon Airways, but service entry has been postponed until next year because of ongoing production problems that delayed the first flight, which had been due in 2007 and is now expected late this year.
__________________
Olle Sweden |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
This is getting out of hand.
Really out of hand. The airlines will be screaming for HUGE compensation for this delay if its true... I wonder how this will effect QF... |
|
|