Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 4th April 2010, 07:24 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur T View Post
I believe at first the additional B737s can turn E170s and E190s away from Inter-state capital (eg. SYD - MEL) service and put them back into much-needed regional routes, such as Sydney - Newcastle, Sydney - Bathurst, Sydney - Wollongong, Sydney - Orange, Melbourne - Avalon (Geelong), Adelaide - Port Augusta etc
I can't believe the likes of Rex, Q-Link and Aeropelican haven't already jumped to the chance of buying/leasing E170's and servicing these routes with bigger equipment. Just what are their bean counters doing with their spare time????

Furthermore, I think you're onto something here Arthur T...the maintenance costs of E170/190's would plummet by servicing these routes, as they could let the pressurisation system do nothing and fly these routes at or below 10000'. Less pressurisation cycles on the airframe is surely better for their resale value too???

For both airline and customer it seems like a win-win to me! Hell, I could even fly to work!
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)

Last edited by Nigel C; 4th April 2010 at 08:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 4th April 2010, 08:00 PM
Paul f. Paul f. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 324
Default

Nigel,most of the flights that these airlines operate are only about 1 and a half hour flying time at the most which makes the SAAB 340, Dash 8 etc perfect for this operation, a jet would be uneconomical with the short distance and small loads.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 4th April 2010, 08:28 PM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul f. View Post
a jet would be uneconomical with the short distance and small loads.
I think Nigel was being sarcastic
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 9th July 2010, 09:29 AM
Dave Dale Dave Dale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 360
Default

Virgin Blue has ordered one more B737-800 this week taking their aircraft orders at Boeing from 40 to 41 for this year. Total to be delivered (according to Boeing) is 59 737-800's.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 9th July 2010, 01:49 PM
steve k steve k is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ADELAIDE South Australia
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan Hothersall View Post
I know most of those airports in SA like Olympic Dam, Port Augusta, Kingscote etc cannot take jet aircraft of E Jet size.

I doubt those airports will be upgraded in the foreseeable future.
Alliance has landed Fokker 100's at Port Augusta a few times in the past, cant see why a E170/190 could not land or take off there.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement