Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 5th June 2008, 05:46 PM
Michael Morrison's Avatar
Michael Morrison Michael Morrison is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben O View Post
wonder what QF will do with the free A330 capacity?
Perhaps put it on PER-NRT and SYD-MNL so that the only long haul 767 flying left under the Qantas brand is HNL ?
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 5th June 2008, 06:49 PM
Ben O Ben O is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 47
Default

SYD-CGK
SYD/BNE-MNL
PER-NRT
SYD-HNL

These will be the only Intl B763 routes. (Apart from NZ)
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 5th June 2008, 07:01 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

perhaps replace 767, dare i say could they possibly use one to do PER-MEL/SYD runs?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 5th June 2008, 07:46 PM
Michael Morrison's Avatar
Michael Morrison Michael Morrison is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben O View Post
SYD-CGK
SYD/BNE-MNL
PER-NRT
SYD-HNL

These will be the only Intl B763 routes. (Apart from NZ)
CGK could be done with domestic aircraft (like NOU and CHC etc)

I was thinking it would be one less 767 config flying around if they got rid of them.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 6th June 2008, 08:45 AM
Lukas M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Also, the reason they said they were dropping SYD-KUL was because they needed the aircraft elsewhere. Does this mean that pax figures to KUL on JQ are struggling, or just they need the aircraft. Has anyone experienced SYD-KUL before?

SYD-DRW-SGN on an A320. How Awful

Last edited by Lukas M; 6th June 2008 at 09:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 6th June 2008, 06:36 PM
Kelvin R Kelvin R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 167
Default

Isnt the seat pitch on the JQ A320 and the A332 the same? The only difference is that seating is 3x3 instead of the more desirable 2x4x2?

Don't JQ already fly MEL-DRW-SIN and CNS-DRW-SIN with the A320 so what is the difference in flight time of the new service?

I guess JQ wasnt seeing much demand for starclass on the route?

If the US and EU airlines can send 757's across the Atlantic I am sure that the A320 can fly across part of the pacific.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 6th June 2008, 06:52 PM
Michael Morrison's Avatar
Michael Morrison Michael Morrison is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukas Mahoney View Post
Also, the reason they said they were dropping SYD-KUL was because they needed the aircraft elsewhere. Does this mean that pax figures to KUL on JQ are struggling, or just they need the aircraft.

It may not even be doing as badly as Japan - but I guess QF want to keep a hold on more of their NRT slots for now.

Also it doesnt appear that these additonal A330's are coming to fruition so something had to be cut.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 6th June 2008, 11:35 PM
Chris Tully Chris Tully is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 92
Default

Seat pitch and type are different on the A320 and A330.

A320 seat design provides for an inch of extra width. Seat pitch is 30 inches.

The A330's are using the exisiting Qantas Y seats with the fabric replaced with leather. Seat pitch is 32 inches.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 7th June 2008, 08:38 AM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Tully View Post
Seat pitch and type are different on the A320 and A330.

A320 seat design provides for an inch of extra width. Seat pitch is 30 inches.

The A330's are using the exisiting Qantas Y seats with the fabric replaced with leather. Seat pitch is 32 inches.
Ask any girl and they would tell you they would prefer an extra two inches
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 7th June 2008, 12:20 PM
Mick M's Avatar
Mick M Mick M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 37
Default

Was in an unnamed large engineering facility only last week and asked the question re the 743's service life and got a non committal answer that mentioned D checks coming up and thus decision time was approaching. The same conversation also mentioned the profitability of large aircraft on the SYD-PER run and the most likely runner would be 332's. So that's my informed comment contribution. So Andrew M's comment would seem to be on the cash.

Marty: Now you're getting into it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement