Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th February 2010, 10:24 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Good on BA for not falling into the trap of chasing the cheap seat punters at the expense of low yields just to fill huge white elephants, eh, I mean VLA's.

I applaud BA for giving the uber rich (and believe me, while there are not the numbers of recent times, they are still there and there will be more down the track) and giving them and their wallets a reason to fly with BA.

If QF and others, don't want 'em, BA sure does.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th February 2010, 11:28 AM
Matt_L Matt_L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Andrew,

one hopes they will continue the one service still- do you have other info?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th February 2010, 11:40 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

The thing is Andew, keep doing the same thing and you get the same result. BA are obviously looking at other options and and if, as you put it, they are "close to financial collapse", then they need to do something different from what they are doing now and maybe even something different to QF and others who are removing F class seats.

History will tell I guess.

As for cutting back on flights? if it's losing money....? I booked a trip with QF to LHR and back a couple of years ago and actually flew with BA on one of the legs. The same applies in reverse and making some money on QF flights is better than losing on their own I expect.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th February 2010, 06:12 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew View Post

The product still remains on the 380 which services the premium markets, maintaining a competitive offering.
Of course, that's why I didn't say "all their first class seats"

Quote:
BA's existing P class product is out-of-date and uncompetitive, just like QF 744 P. For a premium passenger who travels in these cabins, price and schedule are not key drivers as they are for punters down the back. Product is critical considering the costs to travel, thus BA are potentially loosing market share.
I was flying J at the time and the BA seat/service was at least as good as QF, in fact the seat was better (I had no problem facing back as my wife was facing forward) than the QF "bucket" seat which I found too narrow for my 105kg 185cm ex rugby playing frame and could not fit both my arms in the seat beside my body.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th February 2010, 11:43 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

It was the hard edges of the QF Skybed that dug into my arms forcing me to fold them rather than rest them beside me. And this isn't just one trip but several to Europe and Asia.

Other than that sideline, I believe the existing BA product to be the equal at least, of the QF product. The CX and SQ products however, are in a different (better) league to them both IMO. Maybe they are BA's targets, not QF.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement