Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th June 2009, 01:43 PM
Greg McDonald Greg McDonald is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 723
Default VBH Preliminary Operating Stats May 2009

Some interesting figures on here for those that are interested:

http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics...idsId=00964237
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th June 2009, 02:02 PM
BradR BradR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 86
Default

Summary would be that domestic ops are holding up remarkably well. Int'l is a black hole that is consuming all of the domestic profits and more. DJ will be looking to doing somethig with int'l sooner rather than later. The Delta connection may help but otherwise I would expect that DJ will be acquired by Air NZ or the US operation will be shut. Pacific Blue will continue regardless though NZ domestic ops will have to be restructured as the current capacity dumping by JQ, DJ and NZ can't go on.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th June 2009, 02:15 PM
Jarden S Jarden S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
Default

Made good reading, positive news for the airline. Some points are:


Domestic passengers up 5.1% from YTD may 08 to YTD may 09

International passengers up 68% from YTD may 08 to YTD may 09

Total passengers carried from 15.3 million to 16.8 million 10% change

Average size of fleet gone from 58 to 75.2 in YTD may 09 up 29%

On time performance gone from 80.5% to 81.9% YTD may 09
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th June 2009, 03:09 PM
Steve Jones Steve Jones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Default

Hi Brad, whilst you may well be right, I don't think you can make that assumption based on the figures provided, which are purely operational.

Also, whilst domestic loads and pax are doing OK, there is nothing said about yield, and hence for all we know, domestic is also haemorrhaging cash (though, as you say, I suspect it is holding up OK in the current environment, and much better than Qantas mainline domestic).

Going off on a tangent somewhat, it seems that the current crisis is seeing a shift in business traffic on domestic routes - people who traditionally would only fly Qantas are starting to see Virgin as a real alternative. You still get FF points, a good lounge product and high frequency of flights (allowing flexibility), but for a lower price. The result is that Virgin pax numbers are still increasing and Qantas is going backwards. Obviously QF is cushioned somewhat by Jetstar which is also benefiting from the trend of passengers moving towards the lower cost end of the market.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29th June 2009, 07:39 PM
Jon B Jon B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mel
Posts: 88
Default

I know this is not an exact measure but i fly almost evry week on Virgin - usually Mel - Syd Tuesday at 07:15 and return Thursdays around 17:15 Since early this year you can almost guarentee that the middle seats will not be occupied so that takes out 54 pax per 737 - 800. Likewise no one ever in Premium Economy unless they are uprgading pax. Thus thye must be doing very well on leisure routes / outside peak times. But lets hope it all bounces back so we have a strong airline sector
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30th June 2009, 09:54 AM
Michael Morrison's Avatar
Michael Morrison Michael Morrison is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradR View Post
Int'l is a black hole that is consuming all of the domestic profits and more. .
Whilst VA apears to be the black hole, the loads for VA in June seem to be much better... they have gone out full on several days this month. I think May in general is a quiet time for air international air travel... the BTRE stats show it as the slowest month.

As for Pacific Blue, a few of their flights are capped ... would the load factor be calculated on the capacity (180seats) or the capacity available for sale (ie150 seats?)

If it is based on 180 seats then the LF would be lower, but those flights charge $$ for the tickets and then earn considerable extra $$ in excess charges... so yield would be ok on those despite the lower LF I presume???
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30th June 2009, 12:11 PM
Michael Morrison's Avatar
Michael Morrison Michael Morrison is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 507
Default

QF's stats are out today also... JQ domestic declined 1.6$ and QF domestic 4.6%.

QF Int declined 13.5% but JQ INT increased 51%.

Interestingly DJ only carried about 30,000 lesss domestic pax than QF mainline for May.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th June 2009, 12:43 PM
Marty H Marty H is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 748
Default

QF must be flying around alot of near empty B763's if that is the case Mick
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30th June 2009, 10:44 PM
Ricky T Ricky T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SYD and (sometimes) MEL
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty H
QF must be flying around alot of near empty B763's if that is the case Mick
I believe QF is a lot smarter than flying near empty B763s Marty . Firstly, they can easily swap it for a 73H or 734 if there are insufficient pax for a 763 but enough to completely fill a 734 or 73H.

Secondly, they can also cancel flights (which they did on the SYD-MEL route with flights roughly every hour during non-peak hours).

There are lots of things QF (and as a matter of fact DJ) can and will do to avoid flying empty planes.

Speaking of empty planes, I can't help to think how empty my recent CBR-SYD flight on DJ was, accordingly to my logbook, only 28 out of the 78 seats on the E70 was filled. Granted it was a Sunday night flight but I would have thought there would be a bit more than 28.
__________________
Upcoming flights

None
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30th June 2009, 11:22 PM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky T View Post
Speaking of empty planes, I can't help to think how empty my recent CBR-SYD flight on DJ was, accordingly to my logbook, only 28 out of the 78 seats on the E70 was filled. Granted it was a Sunday night flight but I would have thought there would be a bit more than 28.
I was flying on DJ669 CBR-SYD last Monday night. I think there were only 20 passengers max. They changed the aircraft from E170 to Pacific Blue E190 (104 seats). The plane was really empty. The morning flight DJ630 to CBR was full though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement