Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 5th June 2009, 09:18 AM
Andrew P's Avatar
Andrew P Andrew P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: near the old NDB at West Pymble and near RPLR
Posts: 749
Default

as is airline practice after a major incident, Air France will cease using the flight number AF447, AF445 will now be used for that route

Banjo
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 5th June 2009, 10:41 AM
Jason H Jason H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 644
Default

Funny though that Aeroflot still use 593 on the same route that one of their A310s came down on years ago. Youd think they'd want to forget about that embrassment as much as they could
__________________
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your head turned skywards; for there you have been and there you long to return"
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 5th June 2009, 12:20 PM
Gerard M Gerard M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,011
Default

Now it seems they are saying the oil slick and the debris are not from the Air France flight. So the mystery thickens.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/sea-tras...0605-bxsg.html
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 5th June 2009, 01:54 PM
Tony P Tony P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris d View Post
The other talk is of turbulence, and of the plane stalling at 35,000ft.
Sounds like Coffin Corner.

Here's the ACARS:


Taken from here:
http://jt.france2.fr/20h/
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 5th June 2009, 01:58 PM
Montague S's Avatar
Montague S Montague S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 957
Default

any bus drivers able to interpret the above?
__________________
photos updated 29 Sept

Next Flights:
MEL-HKG-HND-HKG-JFK-HKG-NRT-HKG-MEL/CX
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 5th June 2009, 02:33 PM
Troy R. Troy R. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 15
Default

According to the NZ Herald the Brazilian Navy has recovered the first piece of wreckage. Apparently it is a 2.5m long structural member.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 5th June 2009, 02:51 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

From Reuters;

Quote:
Searchers have found several debris sites spread out over 90 km (56 miles), a sign the plane may have broken up in the air. Cardoso said they have yet to collect any debris from the Airbus.
__________________
Next Flights: 08/7 PER-DRW QF | 15/7 DRW-PER QF // 14/8 PER-MEL JQ | 15/8 MEL-PER JQ
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 5th June 2009, 04:43 PM
Hugh Jarse Hugh Jarse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 217
Default

Some that I recognise (not being an Airbus pilot)

Control Rudder Travel Limit Fault
Flag on FO's Primary Flight Display (PFD)
" " Capt's " " "
TCAS Fault
Flight Autothrottle Off
PFD Flags again....
Flight Control Alternate Law
Something to do with Auto FLight
Autopilot Off
.
.
.
Control Secondary 1 Fault
Control Primary 1 Fault
(Possible) IRU1 and 3 FAIL?
More PFD Flags
EFCS Electronic Flight Control System(????) FAIL

FLR=FAIL
WRN=Warning

One thing's for sure - there was a lot happening.......
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 5th June 2009, 05:38 PM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Unhappy

I don't know if lightning could be responsible for whatever led to these messages, but it does raise a concern about the increased number of avionics incidents in recent years.

I think the testing of increasingly sophisticated avionics needs to be a whole lot more rigorous, especially where fly by wire leaves little in the way of alternative flight control means.

Here's someone else's views on the avionics. I don't vouch for them but do share many of them:
http://www.project7alpha.com/2009/06/france-447-facts/
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 5th June 2009, 09:31 PM
Trevor Sinclair's Avatar
Trevor Sinclair Trevor Sinclair is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Inner West
Posts: 105
Default

I hate to speculate and add to any confusion. I have not read every post on this topic, however, this is something I received from a friend today.

There is some information getting out about the mechanical failures that were automatically transmitted to the company by the aircraft ACARS systems (a continuously operating communication system that is sending messages). Every malfunction of the plane is automatically transmitted to the company at the same time the pilots get the warning.

Here is the time line that I have found along with the failures. All time is GMT or Zulu time. For East coast people that means subtract 4 hours to come up with East coast time.

1. 0210Z Autopilot failure. This would be 2210 or 1010PM east coast time.

The pilot is now hand flying the plane in possibly severe turbulence due to the storms.

2. 0211Z ADIRU failure (air data inertial reference unit) The pilots primary attitude, airspeed, and altitude displays are starting to fail. There are backups and I don't know how much has failed.

3. 0213Z SEC 1 Fault, Alternate flight control laws: This is one of the computers amongst several the pilot uses to control the elevator and spoilers (the roll axis). He still has backups, but now the computer systems for flight controls are degraded and the pilot has to be careful not to lose control in the turbulence. The flight control has degraded to what we call alternate law. Time to concentrate on some good hand flying at night in turbulence.

4. NAV warnings and Flight control warnings: Nav warnings are the least of his concerns at this point and I still don't know what he had left for flight instruments, but he has lost some and maybe most primary flight instruments. It's time to ignore warnings and failures and just concentrate on what is working. Maintain control of the plane, wings level, proper pitch attitude and power settings until we get through the turbulence.

5. Last ACARS message at 0214Z 35,000 feet, failure of cabin altitude, electrical problems, pressurization problems. The pilot was unable to safely hand fly the plane. I don't know why. The airplane is breaking up. The pilot has lost control.

Notice that 4 minutes have elapsed since the autopilot failure. At 0214z the multiple warnings and the pressurization problem make me wonder if the pilots were unable to keep the airplane under control, overstressed it at high altitude, high airspeed, in severe turbulence and the overstressed airframe came apart. The pressurization warning may mean the fuselage has broken open and this last transmission indicates that after 0214Z no electrical systems were working because the plane is coming apart as it falls out of the sky and the structural integrity of the wings, fuselage etc. is destroyed.

The wreckage for Air France will be scattered over a very wide area if this is true: i.e., at least several miles as seat cushions are falling from the sky starting at 35,000 feet.

This analysis of Air France 447 is based on what appears to be pretty specific information that is being reported on the web.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement