Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 3rd September 2010, 07:23 AM
Justin L Justin L is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 757
Default

Will this spell the end of EZE-AKL flights, or will they keep some stand alone EZE-AKL sectors or continue some EZE-AKL-SYD, or even EZE-AKL-MEL etc. in addition to non-stops?
__________________
ABQ ABX ACV ADD ADL AKL ALB AMA AMS ANC ARN ATH ATL AUA AUH AUS AVL AVV AZA BCN BDL BFL BGO BGR BHD BHM BHQ BIL BIS BKI BKK BLD BLI BLV BNA BNE BOG BOI BOJ BOS BSB BTR BUF BUD BUR BWI BZE BZN CAI CBR CGK CHC CHS CLE CLT CMH CNS CNX COS CPH CPT CTG CTS CUE CUN CUZ CVG CXF CZM DAL DBO DCA DEN DFW DLH DOH DRW DSM DTW DUD DUR DXB ECP ELP EUG EWR EYW EZE FAI FAR FAT FCA FCO FLG FLL FNL FNT FRA FRS FSD FU'K FWA GCN GDL GDN GEG GGW GIG GJT GOT GRI GRR GRU GSP GTF GUA GVA GYE HAM HAN HBA HBE HEL HHH HKD HKG HLZ HND HNL HOU HRL HSV HVB IAD IAH ICN ICT IDA IND INV ISP IST ITM ITO JAB JAX JFK JNB JNU JOG JTR KEF KGC KIX KMI KMJ KMQ KOA KRK KTN KUL LAS LAX LBB LBE LEJ LFT LGA LGB LHR LIH LIM LIN LRD LST MAD MAF MAO MCI MCO MCT MCY MDE MDT MDW MEL MEM MEX MFE MFR MHU MIA MID MKE MNL MOB MOT MQL MRY MSN MSP MSY MTJ MTY MUC MVD MXP MZT NAN NAS NRT NTL OAG OAK OGG OKA OKC OMA OME ONT OOL ORD OSL OTZ OUI PAE PBG PDX PEK PER PHL PHX PIA PIT PLO PLZ PNH PSC PSG PSP PTY PVD PVG PVR PVU RAP RDD RDM RDU REC REP RIC RIX RNO ROC RSW SAL SAN SAT SAV SBA SBD SBN SBP SCK SCL SDF SDU SEA SFO SGF SGN SGU SHA SHV SIN SIT SJC SJD SJO SJU SLC SMF SMX SNA SOF SSA STL STS SUN SYD SYO SYR TIJ TLL TMW TPA TPE TSV TUL TUS TWF TYS VAR VIE VNO VPS WAW WDH WGA WLG WRG WVB XIY XNA YEG YHM YHZ YKM YOW YQB YQG YQM YTZ YUL YUM YVR YWG YXE YYC YYJ YYT YYZ ZRH

Next Trips:
29APR SYD-LAX-LAS AA
02-05MAY LAS-ATL-LIT-LAS WN
11-12MAY LAS-DEN/CYS-DEN-LAS UA
18-19MAY LAS-DFW-BRO/HOU-LAS AA/WN
25-27MAY LAS-GEG/MSO-LAS WN/G4
31MAY-03JUN LAS-JFK-LAS DL/B6
08-09JUN LAS-PDX-LAS AS
21-24JUN LAS-GJT-LAS G4
04-08JUL LAS-SEA-ANC-ADQ-ANC-SEA-LAS AS
17-18AUG LAS-SEA-KTN-SEA-LAS AS
29AUG-03SEP LAS-MSP-TVC-DFW-LAS SY/AA
28-29SEP LAS-DEN-LAS UA
08-11NOV LAS-EWR/BTV-ORD-LAS UA
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 5th September 2010, 08:05 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mcdonald View Post
WOW. Cant wait for this to happen. However, does anybody know where AR will get these A346'S from as Airbus have stopped making A340's altogether. My guess is maybe Iberia?

Any help would be appreciated.
Maybe Qatar. Didn't Al Baker say he wished he could through his 340-600s away?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 8th September 2010, 05:52 PM
Richard H. Richard H. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Question

Interesting.
However, if they intend to operate direct with A346 equipment I wonder why they haven't trialled it with their A342s?
Best GC distance is 11,789km (6366nm) passing somewhat South of NZ and skirting Antarctica. Even an early A340-211 should be able to make at least 13,800km (7450nm) with the 32J/217Y seat setup the AR birds have.
What am I missing?

On a related note, I do hope they pick up their service a bit. They are a national carrier after all.
My partner and I flew on AR1183 (A342 SYD-AKL) in April and were unfortunate enough to experience AR's variable punctuality, the flight leaving SYD some 150 minutes late. The small refreshment that was supplied was also something of a surprise as I assumed the sector would have a proper lunch service even though it was only a 3 hour hop.
It definitely didn't compare well to the return leg flown on an EK A380. The EK flight was also actually cheaper by about 10% and my partner made her feelings about flying EK over AR next time quite clear to me, but I digress...
The things we do to get on unusual metal...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 9th September 2010, 06:50 AM
John C John C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 81
Default

I have been on AR between Australia and Sao Paulo (brazil) via Buenos Aires, and I can say with a very high level of confidence that Aerolineas is just rubbish.

The aeroplanes are very basic in terms of ife, the machines are old, the service is rubbish Though some crew do deliver a terrific service, and it is just a terrible experience.

I have gone with Lan via Santiago and that is terrific. The contrast is like chalk and cheese.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 6th May 2011, 03:34 PM
Stefan Perkas Stefan Perkas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Default

Afternoon all,

Sorry to drag this topic back up, but there was an interesting article about this subject in todays edition of Travel Today.

Quote:

Plans to operate non-stop services from Sydney to Buenos Aires have put on hold by Aerolineas Argentinas, with no launch date in sight.


While the carrier last year announced intentions to begin direct service by early 2011, (Travel Today, September 1) regional manager Oscar Cilli told Travel Today the plan has beendelayed.


With Aerolineas’ current fleet of 15-year old A340-200s required to operate via Auckland, Cilli said plans for the non-stop service hinges on decisions from head office.

“We need to rebuild our international fleet to make this happen,” he said. “But until head office decide which fleet we use for the long range network, we can't enable this plan.” Still certain the plan will go ahead, Cilli was unable to reveal further details, saying he had “no idea” when the non-stop service will kick off.

He added that non-stop flights were the “only option” for Aerolineas to gain a more
competitive edge in the market. “We are still working on theidea, but it is not easy for us to say when,” he said. “That is up to head office, and until they make a decision, it is hard for us to give any more information.”

Following a dismal financial performance and poor on time figures in previous years, Cilli
stressed the delay did not suggest that the company was doing it tough. “The performance in our companies is getting better,” he said, revealing that revenue from its Australian operation in January and February was 27% ahead of last year. “We have just updated all of our short-haul aircraft and are now more confident that we are doing well in the market,” he said.


The article doesn't state what aircraft they would use for this service, so it is going to be interesting what they would use, if the direct flights do start.
__________________
Stefan

My Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/53284949@N05/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 1st September 2011, 09:56 AM
Bernie P's Avatar
Bernie P Bernie P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 852
Default Aerolineas New Scheme

Sorry again to drag this topic back up, but...

Last week when we were in Hong Kong, we saw the new scheme on the ex Cathay A343 (B-HXN). I have done some digging around on Facbook, and I am told that this bird is waiting for a new interior to be fitted as well, thus the delay in delivery to Aerolineas. I also asked the question as to the non-stop flights, and was told that it is still scheduled for this summer, pending approval... We may see this come to Sydney replacing the A342's though!

Personally, I like the new scheme, but one aspect I dislike is at door 2 where around the door (seal) is a wide silver part which takes away from it...

now, apologies for the pic, its shot through windows within the terminal, and the haze was terrible, but I thought I would share it all the same...

__________________
----------

My Flight Diary

My Photos Flickr Images
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 1st September 2011, 11:11 AM
Peter Agatsiotis Peter Agatsiotis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St Clair 60km from YSSY
Posts: 1,630
Default

Great pic (considering conditions) Bernie and a nice scheme.
__________________
check out the good, the bad and the ugly (photos) at:

http://www.paggsy.smugmug.com
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 1st September 2011, 05:40 PM
Sarah C Sarah C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wishing I was under a flightpath
Posts: 1,355
Default

Agree with Bernie about door 2 - that does ruin the name and stands out on an otherwise good looking livery.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 3rd September 2011, 07:51 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

A million times better than the current (really boring) livery IMO.

Nice work AR
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 3rd September 2011, 04:45 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

New aircraft and new livery probably won't help their seemingly woeful on-time performance.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement