Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 7th September 2009, 12:44 PM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,402
Question

Surely if it allows better yields and also phasing out of a/c that are more costly to operate, it makes sense.

Not sure about the Prius analogy - are you saying the deferral of purchase price is a bigger factor? The leasing costs are all part of the operating profits equation, no question, but does anyone know how the A380 operating profits compare to the a/c it could be replacing?

Am I wrong in assuming they would be superior?
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 7th September 2009, 12:59 PM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 453
Default

One of the reasons is probably to preserve capital.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 7th September 2009, 01:30 PM
Oliver Gigacz Oliver Gigacz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Argy View Post
The website refers to May 2010 deferred delivery of two A380 a/c for QF - if they're so much more efficient to operate, doesn't it make sense to take them as soon as they can be delivered?
Yes there 7th and 8th A380s MSN047 and MSN050 have both flown and are now stored in flightline hangers in Toulouse until MSN047 will be ferried in April and MSN050 in May. Before delivery in November and December 2010. After that will be MSN055 following in 2011 (First pics here: http://a380production.com/2009/09/5-4/ )
But of course we still have MSN027 and MSN029 both scheduled for delivery in October 09.
__________________
Flown:
AIB: 320 (200), 321 (200), 330 (200,300), 340 (200), 380 (800)
ATR: 72 (500)
BOE: 717 (200), 737 (300,400,700,800), 747 (400), 767 (300), 777 (300), 787 (8,9)
DHC: DH3, DH4
EMB: E70, E90
FKR: F100
SWR: SW4
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 7th September 2009, 01:32 PM
Brenden S Brenden S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,069
Default

Oli, that was F, so where is E?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 7th September 2009, 01:50 PM
Daniel F Daniel F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Argy View Post
Am I wrong in assuming they would be superior?
Based on what Qantas is doing then I think the answer to that question is yes. I'm sure Qantas would have crunched the numbers and picked the option that gives the best return.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 7th September 2009, 02:11 PM
Oliver Gigacz Oliver Gigacz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenden S View Post
Oli, that was F, so where is E?
OQE is in another outfitting hanger on the other side. There is a webcam which you can just make out a Qantas A380. It is here. But you can only see it being Qantas when it is dark.
OQE should come onto the flightline next week.

http://www.unser-wedel.de/X_webcambi...F40%7D&lang=de
__________________
Flown:
AIB: 320 (200), 321 (200), 330 (200,300), 340 (200), 380 (800)
ATR: 72 (500)
BOE: 717 (200), 737 (300,400,700,800), 747 (400), 767 (300), 777 (300), 787 (8,9)
DHC: DH3, DH4
EMB: E70, E90
FKR: F100
SWR: SW4
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement