#111
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Word has it that the Boeing Crash crew will be doing the repairs. |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I read a comment from someone about the issue. "Blame Qantas for something which has never happened before – or do we look at Qantas, one of the world's leading airlines, as being the real cause of a day or two which most Aussies would prefer to forget?" which they replied with: "Blame Qantas for a measurable and objective increase in adverse maintenance related incidents." I thought it was an interesting reply...anyone care to comment? I personally believe Qantas has pretty high maintenance standards and i would probably never have any reservations about stepping foot onto a Qantas jet ever in my life (however, the future hasn't happened yet...). |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully this reassures the general flying public...
really the last thing QF needs right now is a mass exodus of passengers who refuse to fly blaming "safety standards"... |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
The discussion re Brenden's intellectual property has been moved to its own thread in 'Technical Discussion', to keep this one on topic.
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Brenden,
Aren't those 4 large green containers potable water tanks? Certainly don't look like oxygen tanks. Regards Steve. |
#117
|
||||
|
||||
Potable Water in the large green tanks
See Brenden's clarification yesterday, Steve:
http://yssyforum.net/board/showpost....&postcount=107
__________________
Philip |
#118
|
||||
|
||||
interesting new report from 9msn..
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=605382 Will or AJ able to expand on this? Quote:
|
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Crew and Pax systems are totally separate, however they are installed in the same area. I showed the picture of the fwd cargo hold as It was the best I could to. The frames to the left is where the oxy cylinders are.
|
#120
|
||||
|
||||
I have seen a number of ATSB Reports that note that the CVR was left running after a major incident and therefore wiped out all record of the incident they were investigating, but usually this relates to post landing where I gather the protocol is to turn off the CVR to preserve the previous two hours rather than capture ground staff chatter.
If more than 2 hours elapses between incident and shutdown of the a/c post landing, I don't see how the incident can be preserved with existing CVR processes. It shouldn't be hard these days to increase the capacity of a CVR, or to make provision for CVR history to be copied manually to other onboard storage media after any major incident so that, short of loss of a/c, more than 2 hours of CV is available.
__________________
Philip |
|
|