Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th October 2009, 12:41 PM
Brad Myer Brad Myer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 467
Default Jetstar To Establish A Second Heavy Maintenance Base

Quote:
JETSTAR is in advanced talks with three state governments about establishing a second Australian heavy-maintenance base and a new engineering-training centre.

The low-cost Qantas offshoot has an existing Airbus A320 maintenance facility in Newcastle, NSW, but needs a second base to cope with its aggressive growth. It has also not ruled out taking work from other airlines.

The carrier is keen to establish the engineering academy to provide a pipeline of skilled labour for its Australian operations, but says it could also act as a training centre for engineers across its Asian brands.

The airline hopes to have the new heavy-maintenance facility established by next year and estimates it would initially create about 100 skilled jobs. But it says there is the potential, when the training academy is included, for this to grow to 300.

The facility would look at both narrow- and wide-body aircraft maintenance, as well as doing work for the Singapore-based Jetstar Asia fleet, and executives say it has attracted strong interest from the three governments.

"We're far down the track in terms of evaluation of options but we've got a broad set of options and they include all the major centres on the east coast," Jetstar chief executive Bruce Buchanan said. "We're looking at Sydney, Melbourne and the Gold Coast for the three primary options."

Mr Buchanan said the new facilities were likely to be set up in a staged approach. He said the positioning of the training academy and maintenance base were not necessarily directly linked.

"But we're definitely keen to get the two decisions ticked off," he said. "We could have the heavy-maintenance facility somewhere and a training academy in another city. So they're not directly linked, but we see a need for the two of them and the two will be quite complementary towards each other if we can get both of them up and running."

Like other Australian carriers, Jetstar is facing an ageing labour force of licensed aircraft-maintenance engineers (LAMEs) who sign off on heavy-maintenance work and are closely involved in the airline's line maintenance.

It takes time to train a LAME because they first have to complete an apprenticeship and work for some time as an aircraft maintenance engineer (AME).

Jetstar needs its heavy-maintenance facilities to funnel through AMEs to the next level and will use the training academy as a pipeline to provide replacements.
Good to see JQ looking at keeping all maintenance in Australia and even moving Jetstar Asia work down here.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12th October 2009, 01:27 PM
Liz E Liz E is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19
Default

Good news for Jetstar. But what would be the point of keeping two maintenance bases running in Australia? Duplication of costs doesn't sound like standard practice for an LCC. Hmmm wonder if there are there some worried faces at Williamtown..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12th October 2009, 04:56 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

They (when they were Impulse) had a perfectly good maintenance hanger built in Canberra using a subsidy from the ACT taxpayer of course. Now it is being used by Qantas Defence Services, but would be good to see it used for the original purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th October 2009, 05:18 PM
Gareth U Gareth U is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 199
Default

What about the facility built at LST for the Southern 146s immediately before the LST 146 operation closed? Who has ownership of that now?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th October 2009, 06:54 PM
Ryan K Ryan K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 354
Default

Please refrain from quoting the above in its entirety as is is not necessary - mod.

The Qantas hanger at LST seems to have sat idle for quite some time. It was used to house the Virgin Blue 737 a few weeks ago after the engine explosion grounded the aircraft for a few days.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th October 2009, 08:08 PM
Raymond Rowe's Avatar
Raymond Rowe Raymond Rowe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 538
Default

Be nice to see it happen here in Melbourne.Will keep my eyes open when the jobs are adevertised.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th October 2009, 09:32 PM
Lukas M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What about AVV?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13th October 2009, 12:32 AM
Mat James Mat James is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14
Default

instead of establishing a new base, wouldn't it be possible to expanded the base at williamtown? or is there problems with doing that?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13th October 2009, 05:26 AM
damien b damien b is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash W View Post
They (when they were Impulse) had a perfectly good maintenance hanger built in Canberra using a subsidy from the ACT taxpayer of course. Now it is being used by Qantas Defence Services, but would be good to see it used for the original purpose.
QDS has essentially left Canberra excluding operations with 34 SQN. They lost the C-130J model maintenance contract. There was talk when i was there in June of leasing it to Qantas link or Qantas for overnight Hanger space.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement