Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th December 2008, 02:50 PM
Andrew P's Avatar
Andrew P Andrew P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: near the old NDB at West Pymble and near RPLR
Posts: 749
Default QF using 747-600

See QF are now using a 747600 as their bPay biller code.

CX HK general phone number was 747-1888 although with new area codes now 27471888

What other airlines have aircraft codes in their number systems

Banjo

p.s. was paying for a flight from CNS to SYD, save the cc fee of $7.70
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28th December 2008, 04:41 PM
Joseph D Joseph D is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 54
Default

The title of the thread is a bit misleading

I didn't think an airliner can be sued.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th December 2008, 02:25 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Lets just "assume" you could sue an airliner, which one would you sue?

For me, probably the 737, just so plain and boring. Give me the heavies any day!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th December 2008, 03:07 PM
Mark Grima Mark Grima is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 495
Default

BAE146, odd looking things, only flew on it once and that was forgettable enough. Also, why does something that little need 4 engines?

Cheers

M
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29th December 2008, 04:43 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Wow, the 146 is one of my all-time favourites. They just have a really cool look about them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29th December 2008, 08:50 PM
Bill S Bill S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Grima View Post
BAE146, odd looking things, only flew on it once and that was forgettable enough. Also, why does something that little need 4 engines?

Cheers

M
Because at some point in aviation, someone decided that at least one aeroplane needed five APU's.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30th December 2008, 06:35 PM
Raymond Rowe's Avatar
Raymond Rowe Raymond Rowe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Grima View Post
BAE146, odd looking things, only flew on it once and that was forgettable enough. Also, why does something that little need 4 engines?

Cheers

M

They tried the Squirells but they got very tired on a long trip. So they tried the hair dryers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement