Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th January 2015, 08:44 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Question AirAsia QZ8501

I notice that the underwater photos published in today's papers show both wings still attached to the fuselage and flaps partially extended. The tail was found 3km from the rest of the fuselage.

Although there has been speculation about a mid air explosion, it looks to me more like an unsuccessful attempt at an emergency ocean landing, probably due to wave size.

Of course the CVR/FDR will reveal much more shortly but the physical evidence is certainly significant.
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st December 2015, 09:54 PM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Post Rudder Travel Limiter failed 23 times!

From today's Straits Times

Quote:
JAKARTA - A confluence of technical faults in an AirAsia passenger jet that the flight crew could not resolve in mid-air led to the crash of flight QZ8501 last December, killing all 162 people on board, an investigation report released by Indonesia on Tuesday (Dec 1) has revealed.

The pilots had tried to resolve the issue according to procedure but was unable to do so because of the "electrical interruption" to the flight augmentation computer (FAC), causing the autopilot to disengage.

The Airbus A320, while in manual flight, subsequently rolled, stalled and crashed, killing all on board.
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd December 2015, 05:24 AM
Mick F Mick F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 852
Default

Partially extended flaps could suggest an attempt at stall recovery as well. It's part of the memory items for stall recovery. If it was an attempted ocean landing, then I don't see why the tail would have been so far from the rest of the aircraft.

Mick
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd December 2015, 05:35 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Question Hindsight ...

Yes - my 15 January speculation was off the mark somewhat, although given the findings released yesterday, it's perplexing that the plane remained so intact from a high altitude stall and a death roll.
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd December 2015, 12:01 PM
Grahame Hutchison's Avatar
Grahame Hutchison Grahame Hutchison is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney's Eastern Suburbs - View From Bondi To Jibbon Point And Bravo 10 South
Posts: 8,533
Default

I found this part of the report disturbing ...

"the system that regulates the plane's rudder movement kept malfunctioning because of a cracked solder joint.Aircraft maintenance records found it had malfunctioned 23 times in the year before the crash, and the interval between those incidents became shorter in the three months prior to the crash, Indonesia's National Transport Safety Committee said in a report."
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement