Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31st March 2009, 07:23 AM
Ryan N Ryan N is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Hong Kong
Posts: 498
Default Sydney Airport voted the country's most unpopular, again

Sydney Airport voted the country's most unpopular, again
By Melissa Jenkins
AAP

March 31, 2009 07:23am

Quote:
SYDNEY Airport has achieved a dubious hat-trick, being named the country's most unpopular airport for three years in a row.
Airport users rated Brisbane Airport the most popular for the fifth consecutive year, followed by Adelaide, Perth, Melbourne, then Sydney.

The consumer watchdog's report into airport performance, released on Monday, also found - again for the third year running - an overall decline in the reported quality of airport services and facilities, despite ballooning profits.

Travellers at Melbourne Airport were the happiest with parking, while they were unhappiest at Sydney.

Parking accounted for $244 million, or 11 per cent, of combined airport revenue of $2.2 billion.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) chairman Graeme Samuel said that as passenger numbers grew at the monitored airports in 2007-08, so too did the airports' charges to airlines.

”Interestingly, the financial performance of the airports does not appear to be strongly related to the quality of service they provide,” he said.

Perth Airport had the highest passenger growth rate - at 13.5 per cent, or 1.1million passengers.

But Sydney and Melbourne airports had the highest increase in absolute numbers, with about 1.8 million extra passengers passing through each of the airports in 2007-08.

Satisfaction levels related to such things as passengers' experiences while waiting in check-in lines and passing through security points.

The ACCC report relates only to terminals run and owned by airport operators.

Some of the domestic terminals are leased and operated by airlines and are not subject to monitoring, including the Qantas domestic terminals in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth.

All international terminals are subject to monitoring.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31st March 2009, 09:11 AM
Tim C's Avatar
Tim C Tim C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YSRD
Posts: 133
Default

Not really a very good survey when it doesn't include Sydney, Perth or Melbourne's Domestic terminals. Still surprised any airport could be voted worse than Perth's Terminals.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31st March 2009, 09:15 AM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C View Post
Not really a very good survey when it doesn't include Sydney, Perth or Melbourne's Domestic terminals. Still surprised any airport could be voted worse than Perth's Terminals.
It includes domestic terminals, just not Qantas' terminals as they are run by QF according to the article.

Quote:
Some of the domestic terminals are leased and operated by airlines and are not subject to monitoring, including the Qantas domestic terminals in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31st March 2009, 09:38 AM
Bill S Bill S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 93
Default

And last week it was apparently the most dangerous as well!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31st March 2009, 04:48 PM
Simon L. Simon L. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 58
Default

No surprise at all, Sydney Airport has actually been ranked poorly at many international travel and industry polls over the last few years as well, and every time SACL would give a classic response to those media enquires by only saying conditions would improve once the international terminal upgrade has finished etc.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31st March 2009, 07:30 PM
Joseph D Joseph D is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 54
Default

It must be said though, the current international terminal is an absolute shambles with the construction going on. It looks very third world and extremely congested. Not surprised at all by this survey.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31st March 2009, 08:23 PM
Grahame Hutchison's Avatar
Grahame Hutchison Grahame Hutchison is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney's Eastern Suburbs - View From Bondi To Jibbon Point And Bravo 10 South
Posts: 8,533
Default

The article above has no specifics at all. I have no problem with either the QF Domestic or the International terminals. I generally use Park & Fly for international trips and find the experience through both terminals to be quite acceptable. The Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne and Brisbane QF terminals are not substantially better or worse than Sydney in my opinion, the sooner you get through any airport terminal the better. If you want an excellent experience, try the QF First lounge in Sydney International, I have not seen anything better anywhere I have travelled in the world.

If you want pathetic try Heathrow or Frankfurt, and I know there are worse still.
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31st March 2009, 10:51 PM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

I agree with you Grahame

I've been through the Qantas, Jetstar and Virgin domestic terminals in Perth, Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Coolangatta and Hamilton Island in the last twelve months and have not encountered a problem with staff, service or facilities. The experiences were really been quite enjoyable and I have nothing to complain about.

Come to think of it, the only problem I've had in more than 35 years flying was way back in April 1981 when there was a strike by Ansett hostesses which left me stranded in Sydney for a week after spending Easter with friends.

I returned to Darwin on QF B747-238, VH-EBK, which I think was one of the first occasions that QF 747s were used on domestic sectors, in this case to move a huge number of stranded passengers.

But that was not a problem with an airport.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31st March 2009, 11:14 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

If you guys have been to Perth and haven't had a substandard experience...then frankly, you haven't been to Perth Domestic Airport!
__________________
Next Flights: 08/7 PER-DRW QF | 15/7 DRW-PER QF // 14/8 PER-MEL JQ | 15/8 MEL-PER JQ
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31st March 2009, 11:35 PM
Montague S's Avatar
Montague S Montague S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 957
Default

Perth domestic airport is appalling, I know, I work in it everyday.
__________________
photos updated 29 Sept

Next Flights:
MEL-HKG-HND-HKG-JFK-HKG-NRT-HKG-MEL/CX
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement